the poster stated that she mostly agrees with victor's sentiments. these being: antisemitism, support for hamas, denial that hamas targeted civilians on oct 7, a belief that the IDF killed more israelis on oct 7 than did hamas, the denial that rape occurred on oct 7, and so on
as anyone that has been following the thread knows, receipts can be provided for each of the above, and i provide an example below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
First, there have been no signs of rape.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
dead naked girls is not proof of rape.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
no credible evidence of rape from Hamas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
the only rapists in this story seem to be the Israeli prison guards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
the witnesses [to rape] dont have credibility bc they already lied about beheaded babies, burned alive babies, oven cooked babies.
meanwhile, we have no mention of it from released hostages nor any credible survivors. those same survivors, and the army itself, has repeatedly acknowledged that Israel shot tank rounds and hellfire missiles at survivors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
I will continue to point out that Israel killed a ton of their own citizens that day and that there is no credible evidence that Hamas did any rape.
maybe she just came here with the intention of trolling mets due to his conduct in a game of pog werewolf fifteen years ago or something, and didn't intend to associate herself with antisemitic posting.
now that she knows, maybe she will clarify?