Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
What about a building that is on fire?
Fire chief has now stopped his staff going in as he thinks the building is close to collapse.
You see your kids at an upper window and their fate is now sealed.
You, wish to take the risk to go in, knowing you may die doing so. Should you be allowed? Should they be able to hold you down and stop you?
I'll make it tougher, as now we know in hindsight the building stood much longer than thought and in fact you had plenty of time to access and get out, if you could avoid the other challenges within.
The short answer is I shouldn't be 'allowed' to go in and yes, they can prevent me by using force.
Otherwise we aren't giving control over emergency situations to people who are trained to handle them.
It sounds like I'd be a hero dad if I did that but in reality who knows what would happen if me and 100 other 'heroes' decided to go into an unstable building ? And not what would happen that one time, but what would happen the next thousand times because now the word is out. If you don't go in to save your children you're a punk. Can you imagine what a mess every emergency situation would be ?
Tragic situations are, by definition, tragedies.
It's like the decisions you hear generals make during war time.
Sometimes there are not good options but you still have to follow the best practices.