Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
That has nothing to do with what we are talking about. We were talking about USA dems now compared to USA dems 20 years ago.
No, we're talking about US Dem
voters.
There have been politicians around forever who have espoused positions like free health care and free college (hence those things being enacted in countries other than the USA for like forever). What's different about now vs, say, 1960, is that those arguments are gaining so much traction.
And why? Because for all the economic growth the USA has seen over the last 40 or 50 years -- trillions of dollars of it -- the amount of that seeing its way to the average man on the street has been steadily shrinking.
Which is not a surprise of course. The more you concentrate wealth in a smaller and smaller group, the more likely it is that those left outside band together and seize it back. Sometimes that's by force, as in the case of 1780s France, and sometimes it's by legal means, such as electing very left leaning politicians. But either way arguing that the have nots should just shut up and take it in the ass is not a winning strategy no matter who is saying it.
Quote:
Current income tax rates have little to do with the current dem politicians. I don't know if you heard, but that tax cut was GOATrump.
No, but it's cute that you think that. In reality the tax cut was pretty much 100% Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell. Written by them, campaigned for by them, and ultimately passed into law because of them. Trump was just their useful idiot. Remember what Mitch said, "The one good thing about Trump is that he'll sign whatever we put in front of him."
Because at the end of the day the guy that you voted for because he was the 'anti-establishment' radical who would take on the entrenched GOP interests lasted for about sixteen nanoseconds. The second he realized that he would accomplish nothing without those two dudes he capitulated to them faster than Sarah Sanders reaching for a Dorito.