Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend)

09-19-2020 , 08:47 AM
If you are a mod, Kelhus is a tough poster to deal with. He has really bad takes on a lot of topics. But I wouldn't say that this views are way outside the mainstream of U.S. political discourse. And I wouldn't say that his posting is non-substantive.

I suspect that he gets banned repeatedly for a few reasons. First, he is deeply wed to a couple of these bad takes. He harps on them constantly. He refuses to move on. Second, he is aggressively sanctimonious. He speculates freely and incorrectly about the motives of other posters while never examining his own motives. There is a reason why he is such a fan of the IDW. It appeals to his sense of superiority.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-19-2020 , 09:52 AM
Just pulling this back up because I remembered calling out Kelhus for evading bans some time ago. It looks like he still has an active account. From August 29, 2019https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1107

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredd-bird
What country is mentioned in the part you bolded?

Do you honestly have this bad of reading comprehension? Every single time you pull a quote or link to an article as a source, you **** it up. I would sincerely expect more "good faith" posting from someone like you, who has had at least five different accounts permabanned from 2p2 and is ban on sight in certain forums.
I was thoroughly prepared to address your question until the last sentence. But now I am done with you. Your bringing that up indicates you are more interested in attacking me than having any sort of honest conversation. Have a nice life.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-19-2020 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
If that's what he was banned for
lololol another guy who has absolutely no idea what actually happened has THOUGHTS on the matter
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-19-2020 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Here is what I know, if Goofy, Trolly, and MrWookie are all going hard in the paint defending the ban, you know it was bullshit. They all want their echo chamber of progressive ideals back, while banning anything that does not comport. I'm not a fan of Kelhus either. Gender essentialism is a concept, a belief, a theory, similar to things like "white privilege". If that's what he was banned for, it was entirely becasue it does not fit the progressive idealistic notions of malleable gender as determined by thought, which, by the way, is a concept, belief, theory as well. One that must be abided by as if it were fact, and all others discredited as "pseudoscience".
I wasn't defending the ban. I was flinging poo at Kelhus in the poo flinging thread.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-20-2020 , 08:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
I wasn't defending the ban. I was flinging poo at Kelhus in the poo flinging thread.
Fair enough.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I will never understand why some people use the same username on all their accounts.
It should concern you more that you have people looking to expose stuff like that, and are allowed to operate on the forum, and for no other reason to embarrass someone.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
It should concern you more that you have people looking to expose stuff like that, and are allowed to operate on the forum, and for no other reason to embarrass someone.
Hahahhahaha, did it just occur to you that someone you know IRL might one day see the drivel you post here and it will cause you embarrassment if not worse? Who knew that being a shitty person with shitty views might have consequences!
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Who knew that being a person with views might have consequences!
FYP.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:26 AM
Like, I know you won't comprehend the nuance and obvious point implied by my response, but I don't care.


Spoiler:
You want people who have opposing views to have consequences, as if that's an enlightened position to have
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Like, I know you won't comprehend the nuance and obvious point implied by my response, but I don't care.


Spoiler:
You want people who have opposing views to have consequences, as if that's an enlightened position to have
Dude, do you know what "consequences" means?
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Dude, do you know what "consequences" means?
Yeah, one of them is being called a shitty person for no other reason than having view that opposes the progressive bent of mind. Like I said, you can't comprehend the point I was making. It has to do with ostracization of opposing viewpoints with the goal to silence them via humiliation. It should not be a humiliating or a consequential experience having a non-progressive view, but it is, and subsequently requires privacy and anonymity in order to speak freely against those progressive views.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 09-21-2020 at 03:38 AM.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Yeah, one of them is being called a shitty person for no other reason than having view that opposes the progressive bent of mind. Like I said, you can't comprehend the point I was making. It has to do with ostracization of opposing viewpoints with the goal to silence them via humiliation. It should not be a humiliating or a consequential experience having a non-progressive view, but it is, and subsequently requires privacy and anonymity in order to speak freely.
If your views have led you on a route where you're defending or supporting the party of Donald Trump, it's safe to say you've taken a turn down "shitty person road" somewhere along the way.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
If your views have led you on a route where you're defending or supporting the party of Donald Trump, it's safe to say you've taken a turn down "shitty person road" somewhere along the way.
John Wayne Gacy was a shitty person, and it was not because he was a Democrat. Maybe a reductio ad absurdum helps you understand.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
John Wayne Gacy was a shitty person, and it was not because he was a Democrat.
This is true, and also completely irrelevant. Hint: one can be a shitty person for one's political views, but also, check this out, for other reasons unrelated to politics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Maybe a reductio ad absurdum helps you understand.
Your complete inability to correctly apply the concepts you claim to understand makes it all the more amusing when you try to invoke them in conversation to make yourself feel smart.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
This is true, and also irrelevant.

Hint: one can be a shitty person for one's political views, but also, check this out, for other reasons unrelated to politics.
Right, I know, anyone who supports Trump is a shitty person, irrelevant of their actual reasons for supporting him. That's what you believe, and your belief is based on an association fallacy, then you use that to impune the character of someone. Trump = shitty, and must mean his supporters are shitty.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Right, I know, anyone who supports Trump is a shitty person, irrelevant of their actual reasons for supporting him. That's what you believe, and your belief is based on an association fallacy, then you use that to impune the character of someone. Trump = Shitty, and must mean his supporters are bad.
Impugn. And yes, you pretty much got it in one. Some politicians, parties, or political movements are so bad that supporting them makes someone a shitty person by virtue of that act alone. It's not always fallacious reasoning: would you agree that people who support David Duke are shitty people, for example?
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 03:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Impugn. And yes, you pretty much got it in one. Some politicians, parties, or political movements are so bad that supporting them makes someone a shitty person by virtue of that act alone. It's not always fallacious reasoning: would you agree that people who support David Duke are shitty people, for example?
No, I would think they are ignorant.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 04:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
No, I would think they are ignorant.
I think there's been a misunderstanding. Just because I think you're a shitty person doesn't mean I don't also think you're ignorant. I just didn't see the need to bring it up.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 04:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I think there's been a misunderstanding. Just because I think you're a shitty person doesn't mean I don't also think you're ignorant. I just didn't see the need to bring it up.

I don't care. You asked me question and I answered.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 09-21-2020 at 04:06 AM. Reason: hint: support for a view/person by itself is not indicative of character
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 04:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
I don't care. You asked me question and I answered.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; Today at 09:06 AM. Reason: hint: support for a view/person by itself is not indicative of character
Lol, of course it is dude. You don't get a pass on shitty opinions by calling them "politics". It's not some magic word you just get to invoke that gives you impunity to say whatever you want without consequence. "Hey guys, I think we should gas all the Jews, but don't judge me on that, it's just muh politics".
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 06:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Lol, of course it is dude. You don't get a pass on shitty opinions by calling them "politics". It's not some magic word you just get to invoke that gives you impunity to say whatever you want without consequence. "Hey guys, I think we should gas all the Jews, but don't judge me on that, it's just muh politics".
I would add that not all people with abhorrent views are ignorant. Some are well-informed people who have made an enormous effort to construct justifications for their abhorrent views.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Lol, of course it is dude. You don't get a pass on shitty opinions by calling them "politics". It's not some magic word you just get to invoke that gives you impunity to say whatever you want without consequence. "Hey guys, I think we should gas all the Jews, but don't judge me on that, it's just muh politics".
shitty opinions ≠ shitty person (in the vacuum you've constructed).
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 07:56 AM
The need to call people shitty is nothing to do with politics. It's just a character trait - one that can be grown out of.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 07:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
The need to call people shitty is nothing to do with politics. It's just a character trait - one that can be grown out of.
Exactly. Shitty is a subjective characterization. Guess who decides what is shitty, and force consequences on people for their subjective interpretation of what is shitty, and who thinks this is a completely rational way of doing things in a civil society that values speech.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
09-21-2020 , 08:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
shitty opinions ≠ shitty person (in the vacuum you've constructed).
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
The need to call people shitty is nothing to do with politics. It's just a character trait - one that can be grown out of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Exactly. Shitty is a subjective characterization. Guess who decides what is shitty, and force consequences on people for their subjective interpretation of what is shitty, and who thinks this is a completely rational way of doing things in a civil society that values speech.
Ok. Maybe we could find another word. How does "deplorable" sound?
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote

      
m