So do you remember now then?

There you go with those cliches again.

I posted a story from a usually reliable source that turned out to be mistaken. And that source owned up and openly admitted that he got it wrong. How many on the left ever do that? Very few I would suspect.

The point is that you didn't admit you were wrong, and you never do, no matter how many times your bullshit is debunked and/or your lies called out.

How would you know? Whenever you’re called out on your fake news you just move on and post another fake story. Everyone here has seen how you operate.

Anyway I’m done engaging with the trolls. Time for something completely different…



Jill Stein nazbol confirmed? (/j in case it isn’t obvious)

Looks like fake news.

https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/15...es-jill-stein/

Stein disavowed. Apparently Duke endorsed her over her stance on Israel compared to Trump.

25% increase in a day

Incorrect. I don't post fake news. I'm a very factually driven person. As I said my sources are usually pretty reliable.

Occasionally I might get it wrong but it's very rare.

That story I posted was corrected and the correction posted itt before I was aware that it was corrected. Therefore there was no need for me to repeat it and post the correction myself.

Just checking, was the 2020 election rigged?

Excellent, I'll go ahead and update the list of posters who self identify as factually driven, non fake news posting, good faith netizens. So far we have:

- Brian James
- Playbig2000
- Victor
- Deuces McCracken

There's something all these posters have in common, but I just can't seem to put my finger on it. A certain je ne sais quoi, I guess.

Neither do you, which is why you're a hypocrite and your value judgements of others are unimportant. Some of your beliefs about reality are objectively wrong and some are debatable, but not only will you never admit either, you berate others into thinking they're bad people for differing with you. This shaming tactic is designed to coerce compliance, but you're not actually changing anyone's mind. You're just making them hate you and be even more firm in their beliefs, and then they elect Trump. And then in your astounding ignorance you blame their character flaws for that too.

It’s funny how you got mad at me for saying that you pigeonhole everything into your preconceived narrative but that’s every one of your posts. Sad!

21 days of complete and utter bullshit from the right to go...and then POOF

Yep. I wish I was still a gambler because I would put a pretty good amount of money on 300+ electoral votes for Harris.

By the most optimistic standards, even if kamala wins POOF only occurs after jan 6 and it becomes official

The 2 months between Election Day and Jan 6 would be significantly worse than the lead up has been if kamala wins

I wouldnt touch the general election but the pop vote here looks appealing for Harris. Id imagune the 3 main catalysts here for this to happen would entail a great amount of

...sexism
...hispanics for trump
...low turnout

Im probably going to put money on this rn.

I try not to have any preconceived narrative. Many of my beliefs, unfortunately, are not reflected in either of our current choices for President, and I don't suspect they will ever be.

However, the evidence suggests we don't really live in a democracy, so when you and people like you claim Trump will destroy it if he gets elected, I'm skeptical. When they say he attempted to destroy it last time he got elected, even though he left office peacefully and is no longer in power, I'm skeptical. When they claim the will of the people is paramount yet acted any way they could to contravene it including tenuous impeachments, made-up dossiers, and removing him from the ballot, I'm skeptical.

What I see from "your" side is that whenever it suits you to debate an issue, you will move goalposts, change definitions, back away from your supposed ideals, ad-hom and emotionally blackmail your opponent. You'll even contradict yourself like in one breath claiming abortion should be legal but in another that murdering a pregnant female should be considered double homicide. Or that if a man closes his eyes, crosses his fingers, cuts off his balls and puts on lipstick while wishing to Auntie M, then by some progressive magic he transforms into a woman. Not only that, but everyone including me has to agree or our livelihoods are threatened.

What I see from the other side is that they're tired of being called racist and privileged and stupid and redneck and backwater and whatever other pejorative you can come up with. So fed up that they will elect a reality TV star just to piss you off. I don't really blame them.

Your candidate is not doing well and she has agreed to be on Fox for a 30 minute unedited interview. I wouldn't count my chickens.

Brace yourselves

A judge just put an end to Trump’s sinister plan to try to steal the election in Georgia

It’s scary that fair elections might come down to a single judge doing the right thing.

The Leon bump has to be the most overrated concept I’ve ever seen. If you’re the kind of ADOPT ME ELON super weird Tesla bro who needs to follow whatever he says, chances are you were already voting for Trump

If you were a true undecided there’s no chance on earth Leon tipped the scale for you

I don't think it has anything to do with Musk. Trump gaining 15c probably has more to do with early voting indicators than what Elon is tweeting. It's probably info we just don't really have yet.

But the bettors have that info?

Not sure how this logic tracks at all unless you somehow think betting sites have access literally nobody on planet earth is legally allowed to have on polling

Most likely betting odds are tracking sentiment and even Leon himself is hyping the betting odds so it makes more sense that if the owner of Twitter with 200 million followers is shilling betting movement towards trump you should push the odds further in trump’s favor regardless of a basis in reality