Quote:
Originally Posted by SergiyK
They've seized UMW transfers to players before (those sent in May 2011) - what is different now?
It's not a question of moral or stupidity - rather of technical possibility or lack thereof. Like I said before, they cannot just easily put a universal order to all banks. In May it was not necessary since all transfers went through the same US intermediary. So now it is a tougher job for feds, and they also have to act and think quickly. Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope they won't succeed.
A lot is different now. Mainly, Chargestream isn't doing business in the United States anymore. That was the whole point.
I didn't say it wasn't technically possible--in fact, I think I was clear on the contrary. When people are legitimately worried that a seizure is
likely, it becomes much more than an issue of technically possible. Now you have to look at the practicality of them doing it. This requires analyzing cost/benefit (or smart/stupid). If the government gets involved in this process, it's a lot of cost and little benefit.
Just another note: the accounts that were frozen in May, from Fortis Bank in the Netherlands, had "proceeds from an illegal gambling business" and were "involved in money laundering transactions" (from the
Linwood Affadavit). If they do not send the funds from dirty accounts, the risk is reduced substantially.