This added to the comment I believe he made about playing 1 table just doesn't add up.

That's what I'm seeing. Super tight tables imo.

100NL, full stacks: Standard raise with AK, guy min raises, I shove and after tanking he calls with K2!

Cool story bro

+1 thinking rush week is sick. But I guess the regs, and I am one of them, should adapt themselves. Not that I seem capacble of doing that, since I lost 15 buy ins since rush week started, but... Things seem so weird out there. Plus I have been traveling during the world cup (South Africa is great!), so I got back and was realy confused. The problem is: I look at my stats and they are pretty much the same as they were during my good months. What could be so wrong?


About the guy claiming he makes 200$ an hour at NL 25, I was wondering: is that the same as winning 8 full stacks at an hour playing just 1 table? At rush, you play like ~300 hands each table an hour, isn't it? If so, is this guy winning 1 buy in every ~40 hands?? Man, I realy need to sign in at FT using the same account, since there are sessions it takes me much more than that to make any playable hand after flop...

Today was 2797 hands over 2.73 hours So that works out to a little under 900 an hour

2757 hands over 99.6 minutes. 6-tabling

you mean 1000 hands an hour

Completely plausible.

If I am in the BB and I elect quick fold, and it folds around to me for a walk am I getting rewarded the pot even though I am not at the table?

I never really thought of this before, because I never quick fold my BB, not wanting to surrender the pot just in case im in a b v b situation.

You cant quick fold the bb....

lol, cant believe I didn't know that with how many rush hands I've played...

Hey, Im looking for a post or chart that has the bb/100 taken out of the games for all the rush limits. I know ive seen posts with this info before but can't seem to find it. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Well I just ran some quick math myself for Full Ring games:
This is the amount of bb/100(rake) taken out of the games...
5 NL - 7.4 bb/100
10 NL - 8 bb/100
25 NL - 5 bb/100
50 NL - 4.24 bb/100

So who has stats of playing like 50k hands and and can show a big profit can be made after paying the rake at the stakes offered currently on rush poker?

if so please pm me ..

I play for a living but dont know if rush poker is profitable after paying the rake at stakes offered?

mike

um these games have the same rake schedule as the non rush games so yeah

Does anyone mind posting there Rake and Hands played at 100 NL and 200NL Full Ring rush. Ill calculate 100 NL and 200NL in the morning.

Thanks

Not quite ready gor that )) Taking Into account that I do a lot of other things at the same time.

But thanks for the advice.

LMAO...My bad guys ))

I really took the highest numbers from the best session ))

Anyway I posted the overall.

Thanks for you thoughts on this.

You guys just born a challenge for me ))

Yeah, Just figured it out that 200$ an hour is pretty high ))

I got it from some very good short sessions.

My bad.

But I'm learning ))

$200/hr is peanuts. consider moving up to 50nl only when clearing $1k/hr (not inc rakeback obv)

Or loosing $1k/Hr ))

Not quite ready ))

adutsu is a gimmick acct

adutsu itself is a gimmick

Am I the only one finding it increasingly more difficult to get action on AA?

Are players less inclined to play midpairs and will only reraise/call if they also have an A? If I have 2 aces obviously there's less chance of anyone else having one and it just folds around. I'm theorizing that not that long ago more players were playing those pairs and giving action more often.

Could be an rush week effect but it seems to have been developing a little longer than that.

Or maybe it's just variance.