[QUOTE=Bobo Fett;18431428] Is it really that hard to ignore a few posters you have such an issue with?

QUOTE]

You aren't seriously asking me that? These "few posters" post thousands of times.
Did you ask qpw? fuego? wiki? lvg? (maybe Josem?)

The unwillingness to communicate by some leaves little doubt it's done by design.

I won't deny you're doing an OK job.

oh look one of the ignored trolls just made 4 posts in a row

Edit button buddy.

Ignored? I beg/dare ya.
You'de get fired.

Lemme plant a few seeds, out of a job if you let them grow.

That must look neat on the page.

I think they should arrange it so that if you get a page of posts by ignored trolls the software doesn't split the screen into posts but just displays: "Nothing to see here. Move on".

Many posts ago I said exactly that, that we could never find rig because we just dont know where to look at. So we agree, the game could be rigged but we will never know it becauise we dont know where to look at.

Dude, you really need to go back and reread all those posts - slowly.

Now Im playing....

I think it's always been agreed that we can accept that anyone might be rigging the game at an extremely low level but that is pretty much irrelevant to the user experience because we could detect such rigging by statistical methods long before any rigtard became aware of a real (as opposed to imagined) effect.

We (i.e. qpw? fuego? wiki? lvg? (maybe Josem?)) communicate in that we respond, logically, to the stuff you and the other riggies put out.

You and the rest of the rigtards do not communicate since you ignore any posts that address your concerns (or regress to calling people shills).

And I'm 100% certain that you do that by design.

It's a reliable tell for someone who has not got a clue.

Don't waste your time toltec.

You need to progress beyond conversing in a stacked debate.

This thread is rigged!!

And presumably you are going to keep posting in a thread that you believe to be rigged against you in much the same way as rigtards continue to play on sites that they believe rig the deal against them.

Sometimes it's very easy to see that 50% of people are below median intelligence.

In the case of the rigtards here, WELL below.

1) Your logic is almost always flawed.
2) You don't allow "rigtards" to communicate
3) I have progressed to calling people shills(1+2=3)

you want to find a rig just to see if its possible-play the $250.00 free rolls on party and witness for yourself how it can be rigged to favour big stacks.Now you naysayers to rigged sites need not roply to this post as we have heard it all already from you naysayers who ensure the sites will not doom you as you all horsemanure the sites are legit

I think this thread is much easier to un-rig.

Why the harsh tone?

This guy seems to think it is rigged to favor small stacks:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=8969




You can't both be right.

Clearly that guy is a shill planted to discredit his side of the argument.

Of course they can.
Silly to deny they can't.

[QUOTE=Beaten Senseless;18439321] I do not understand why I mentioned that. I made good use ignore feature.

However, it was funny when you click "Go", where they are not sure signs say. Maybe I'm just a masochist.

^^^ ??? Don't understand this.

Yes, I sure am.

Why would I ask them? They're not complaining about this thread, you are.

Actually, I see them communicating a lot more than you. You used to, um, sort of communicate. Now you just seem to troll.

How do I get a blue nickname?

You have to be a winner, sorry. BUT, as you can see, I don't qualify either


** Btw, BS, keep my name out of the whole "qpw, fuego, wiki, maybe Josem?" thing please. Those guys actually have contributed to "the debate" through their posts. I haven't. I'm only here to post random jokes, pictures, and yes, occasionally, a thought or two. But those guys have actually tried to help out itt (regardless of how you might see it).





I'm not the only one with jokes. WP señior Fuego. WP!

I would never claim that I never made a mistake. I doubt if any of the other 'shills' would either.

However, if you spot a mistake, the correct response is to point out the mistake and offer the corrected logic. That way you gain credibility for both your objection and for yourself. Simply posting general 'hand flapping' and saying someone is wrong will do neither.

You only even attempt to communicate at a very basic level.

Please explain how we stop you from doing that.

Have you ever stopped to ask yourself why you feel that it is you that is being prevented from communicating and not us? You're certainly making enough posts.

Do you think it might be because 'the other side' always manages to respond to your points with logical counterpoints? I think in your heart of hearts you know that the only reason you feel you are not being allowed to communicate is because you know your case is incredibly weak.

It's rather like having a bunch of people who go around telling anyone who'll listen that the Earth is flat. They can make as much noise as they like but if there are others following them around with photographs of the earth taken from space they will make little headway getting their view across.

I suppose they could then accuse others of 'preventing them from communicating' but such a claim would be as laughable as the one you're making here.

Yes, and it does you no good because, even if it were true anyone with any sense will be persuaded by the arguments rather than who made them.

You're only one out!