I'll tell you one thing that's for absolute sure: Nobody has ever wasted more of their time in life than Monteroy has in this thread. With nothing to possibly gain or achieve, he barrels ahead with wall of text after wall of text, combating anyone who dare question the credibility of online poker. No doubt, history will remember this man and his grand contribution to society.

Hopefully that made you feel better to say that. Feel free to complain and whine about me as you need. Lots of riggies whine about everything, while taking no responsibility for their lack of success, so you are fitting that character quite well. I did actually give you proper advice in my earlier post as to what you needed to do to actually become better in this industry, but I did preface that by saying I did not expect you had it in you to do that. Thank you for making that prediction come true, and better luck in those 10NL games you continue to play that you believe are rigged against you.

All the best.

1) Playing 20nl and 50nl

2) Winning

3) gg

Kewl. Keep up the good work (play)!

With 100% respect and zero slight....

50nl should not be close to tough if you're a good online player.

I get what you mean by the game is the game regardless of stakes, but if you think it is anything close to your breakdown of only 10% skill....you are not a good player nor understand the game.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/2...012-a-1785447/

A good chance for riggies to ask about whatever their fantasies are to someone who is openly talking about his employment experiences at Full Tilt. Hurry, before the riggie secret police silences him!

The thing is they say that general artificial intelligence is about 10 years away, imagine if they got it to question whether online poker was legit as in it was as realistic and fair as it possibly can be, and they got it to reverse engineer all the poker software and hand histories and it came up as unrealistic, "entertainment" action based poker that was setting up hands and doing all sorts of crap to make an online business last, wonder what Monteroy would be saying then with his 10k+ posts under him

I would say that riggies like you have posted all sorts of "imagine if" scenarios for well over 10 years at this point, and riggies like you will continue to do that, just as you are doing today.

I said the same thing to riggies with posts like your 10 years ago. I can't say much to them today as they have all since failed and moved on. Same will apply to you in the future when a different riggie asks what you did, with that riggie also believing that proclamation to be a deep, insightful observation, when all it is is a whine because you cannot compete effectively in this industry. Just the riggie cycle of life.

All the best.

Monteroy would say the same exact thing:
A) Deny the rig
B) Insult the poster
C) Continue to act like dix

A') Asking for evidence is "denying the rig?"

B') Monte "insults" posters who make extravagant claims with NO evidence. He also gives them excellent advice by encouraging them to quit poker if they believe that the time and money that they are investing in playing poker will lead to certain loss.

C') This is a joke thread, and one of Monte's sources of humor is sarcasm. A legit rig concern would find its own thread.

Have a nice day!

The irony is for many years I offered a healthy reward to any riggie who can definitively prove a verifiable rig on a major site. With all the riggies that literally see the rig with their own eyes, one would assume it would be easy for them to do, but so far none have even tried for some reason.

Apparently saying a current riggie saying the same thing long forgotten past riggies said is a form of an insult. Not sure what to say about that, as I always want riggies to be creative with their imaginations, rather than repetitive.

As to the standard riggie dix fetish, he/she/other may want to read gentler forums if the language in this thread causes him/her/other to collapse on a fainting couch.

My favourite riggie theories were in the Global Poker Forum. The Sweepstakes Model provided a new paradigm for the riggies to exercise their imaginations.

Who can forget the "Every Preflop Shove/Call is a Coin-flip" theory?

After a hiatus I return to see you are still dropping truth bombs on the masses.

Keep up the good work Monteroy!

--
Kahn

Um, he's the laughing stock of the forums. Do you have any idea what people say about him in pm? lol

Look at the sheer number of posts from him, in this thread, where he's basically just repeated himself. Most of the thread is him arguing with "riggies". The man's insane. Nobody would spend that much time with nothing tangible attached to it unless they had lost their grip on reality. Something about this topic set him off at some point and when he received counterarguments, he just totally lost it. His years of posts in this thread are the result.

Look at the picture of lagtight. Can you imagine what Monteroy looks like?

Feel free to share the vibrant conversations you have about me in PMs and tell everyone how many hours you spend in PMs talking about me. I can share all the chats and discussions people have had about you pretty quickly, since there are none and never will be any.

Well, you can spend as much time as you like fantasizing about my image as you like. Feel free to share how many hours you think about these things. In contrast, nobody ever thinks, cares nor posts about what you may look like, because nobody cares.

Something for you to ponder the next time you post with this second/third/fourth who knows account here obsessing about me when all you should be doing in this industry is quitting. Never play another hand of poker for the rest of your life, and move onto other things.

All the best.

lol

Perfectly defines the mentality!

Indeed. Guy's a joke.

The two of you can verbally pleasure each other as much as you need, while (without awareness) both of you believing I am the one who posts in a weird way in this thread. No doubt the two of you spend a lot of time getting each other excited via PM as you said earlier. Congrats on meeting each other, the two of you clearly make each other happy.

In the end you both really should quit all forms of poker, though I know you will not and people like me will continue to extract your money in the end, so I do appreciate that people of your caliber are my "competition" in this industry, and it has helped make it easy to succeed as long as I have so far. Guessing you are both Trumpderps as well, because Trumpderps were beyond easy to take their money the past year, so thanks if you helped contribute in that way as well, and good luck in the nano games you play.

All the best.

He and I have never once had any interaction in pm or in any thread, as far as I can remember. We do not know each other. You're just universally known as a tard so it's not even uncommon to walk around in Times Square and bump into a rando who enjoys a good Monteroy laugh.

All the best.

You were the one talking about how excited you and others got via PM talking about me. Then you come here and post a lot about me. Nearly every one of your posts is about me. You even fantasize that people in Times Square talk about me, assuming that random people in New York City share your weird obsession with me.

I get that you think this is some odd form of personal insult that will have some impact on me for some reason, but all you are is the latest stalker in this thread. You are just pretty open about your obsessive behavior, because you have no idea how it reads. In the end that is totally your problem, so if you walk around Times Square asking strangers if they know Monteroy, much like you do with that one post stand with the other guy just now or your super special friends in PM - no difference to me, as you will vanish and not be remembered just like all the stalky riggies before you. Until then - better luck in your nano games and feel free to copy the All the best line again to satisfy those stalky needs of yours. By the way, no need to confirm you are a Trumpderp - it is pretty obvious.

All the best.

I'm almost certain that you're the only person in this thread who ever wondered or cared what Monteroy looks like.

Kinda creepy, in my opinion.

I doxxed myself in the Politics Forum, so I thought it might be kewl to have my actual mug as an avatar. (Plus I'm very vain about my appearance. In fact, I write a letter every month to GQ insisting that they put me on the cover. Surprising as it may be, they have declined to honor my request.)

Zero proof of fairness from a single site either!

It says more about you frankly, that you'd advocate people throw money on unregulated sites, without any proof that their software is legit.

Do you seriously believe that luck being the biggest factor in poker is news to anyone?

Can you be more specific about the long run? How many hands is that?

He's not wrong though. I mean, this line sums you up beautifully:

>Nobody has ever wasted more of their time in life than Monteroy has in this thread.

Have a nice day shilling!

Ah, the thread prokaryote extracts its head from thine lower unit to burp.

Good seeing you.

No idea who you are, but I assume you are one of the people he mentioned that has hot and steamy PM exchanges with him. Who knows, maybe you are another posting account of his, which means you play with yourself over the riggie topic? Anyway, enjoy the pleasure the two of you give each other talking about me as you apparently need, but be sure to quit all forms of poker as well.

All the best.