Very helpful

I'm guessing your previous post took longer to write than you spent thinking about your comments

If you didn't have 4 years of posts on here whining like a little girl about losing 40 bbs, I'd be certain you were a gimmick. You're like a living rigtard stereotype. I mean, for ****'s sake, you've been convinced of this whole "I lose 70% equity hands 80% of the time!" bull**** for 4 years, and you've still yet to figure out how to test it.
Can you wipe your own ass?

Don't worry guys i live in NJ after my most recent beating on carbon i will stay away from online till AC sites come online an let you know if their is a difference.

Total credibility booster dude. And so thoughtful

Yes, it was that one hand I'm always whining about. You've outted me!

Well, I don't know if you're going to consider this evasive, but it really depends on what you're looking for. I'm not a stats expert, but I know you're going to need to decide on one or two things you believe you are seeing on a regular basis, and test for those.

I think you've pretty much spelled out what you're looking for; now you just need to teast out the data. I don't know if there's a way to filter for hands with X% equity against only players that are "fish", which I guess you could define by looking at some thing like their BB/100 winnings (or losses in this case) stats. Maybe you can find some help in this regard in the PT or HEM thread in the Commercial Software forum.

Geez, you're just such an awful poster. Easily the worst in this thread by far right now. Actual conversations going on, and you just pop in with this stupid non-sequitur again, all proud of yourself because Josem hasn't posted for a few days, which is mind-numbingly stupid when we're the ones who pointed out to you how ridiculous your assertion was given that he posts in here rather infrequently and he doesn't work 24/7. Yet here you are still prattling on about it.

Move along, you've become nothing but a troll now.

Exactly. Funny the timing here of the "Fair Play" bull****...Right before states start to open up regulated sites.

But who's to say some Tonka Toy collector won't get greedy and try and pull some riggory anyways and try and slip one past the goalie in the regulated market? How are we supposed to even believe that it will be fair shuffle and deal even then? Just a joke

Too funny, too funny. Every time someone comes on here and complains about running horribly all the shills chime in and demand that they download HM. The guy from a few pages back does just that and shows his suspicious all-in EV chart, and the shills now say "all-in EV is irrelevant"!? Who do you shills think is buying your bullsh*t?

I've been so tempted to post some of my runs of horrendous beats over the last few days, but I'm not even going to bother. I am beyond convinced of Cake Poker rig. I can't speak for Stars but I guarantee none of the "expert coaches" from this thread could win on my account.

I finally found someone who has a little more of a condition than Dr. Monty. This one may be 4x the height of my monitor

I'm not sayin the US Fed will regulate or audit perfectly. Hell, I doubt they'll even do it well. HOWEVER, Pokersite has to assume they will want to audit their software at some point in the process.

I believe the US DoJ already has concerns about Pokersite's software but chose not to include that issue in Black Friday indictments because they have bigger concerns and easier charges to prove than consumer fraud.

I will enjoy playing on Caesars Poker here in the US. And they won't have to rig the deal because they already have a legit business.

15 sentences sure is a lot to read, maybe you can work your way up to it.

I will enjoy you crying about Caesars Poker being rigged the second you lose a flip.

I don't think we necessarily need to identify anyone as a 'fish'. As I've been saying recently, I've been experimenting with fishy play myself (overcalling small pocket pairs and draws) and have been rewarded for doing so far too often (but still lose all recent profit with AA v A/rag all-in pre flop). I suspect the rig is designed to reward fishy play (i.e. inexplicably horrible calls), especially in all-in scenarios.

I don't know about HEM but I do know that PT does not track all-in equity street-by-street (I recently posted a link to a PT response in this regard). Dude who asked did so because he felt PT was hiding the necessary stats so as not to offend (Stars was the impression I got). The PT reply was that they decided there was little value in that particular stat. You can filter for each street but not combined EV or equity to determine some 'luck' or bad beat factor.

Is there an easy way to find my post with that link? Dude said it better and I suspect the PT rep is related to Monteroy

I do know that there are more riggies on PT and HEM forums than are here and they are asking the same questions and getting the same answers (i.e. there is no reliable stat to reveal the all-in/bad beat rate we are looking for)

If you click on your own name and choose "Find more posts by...", you can find see your last 250 posts. Or choose search at the top of this page in the middle, then advanced search. Enter your name in the "Posted By" field, or whatever it's called, and then you can choose a keyword or two at the same time.

Thanks Bobo (never thought I'd be saying that)

Originally posted 02-02-2013

Sorry. I thought I posted the link too.

And this was HEM, not PT...my bad

I hear you, but the more of us who post, the more likley lurkers are to heed our warnings. Please, don't let the shills deter you. They are but a few zelots with motives, whatever they may be.

You know as well as i do that we won't even be having these conversations. Players that know how to consistently get their money in good in the most important spots will easily maximize our profits vs all the new players who get excited about legal poker. It will be so joyful.

Below is how we will Bruce Lee the recreational fish in legal poker...

LOL!

OK, let me say it again.

When I say he needs to call $152 to win $422 I am describing the odds IF he calls. He can win $422, and if he chooses to call that then he needs/will have to/must put in $152.

I'm not saying that he needs/ought to/must call. In fact did I not explicitly say that I thought this was a bad call ?

By playing shortstacked, OP engineers a situation where these kind of pot commitment scenarios will happen all the time.

I am looking at that hand in a vacuum, I have no idea whether there was any dynamic between OP and the villain. Against an unknown, which is how I looked at it, I would take OP's play as having his hand face up and him having 100% value hands in this spot. If there could be a percentage of air in OP's range there, then it becomes close.

But really my point is more about shortstacking. In 3bet pots you will see stacks get in on the flop a LOT due to pot commitment issues. This doesn't make the villain's call here any better, but OP will see a lot of situations where his opponent calls off his stack light because of stacksizes.

Good heavens, what a witty post!

I wonder why none of the other riggies haven't come up with this nonsense before.

Oh, wait ...

I'm not a stats expert - can you go through one of the posts detailing why the poster thinks AI-EV is a poor measure to draw conclusions on and tell me where their reasoning is off? Maybe take CMAR's post (linked a few posts up) and go through that one line by line?

Why do you believe this?

Riggies genuinely that that nobody will believe the US sites (when they run) are rigged?

People already are deeply paranoid about the automated shuffler machines that many of these same US casinos use, and a decent percentage of the US population believes the government was responsible for flying planes into buildings over a decade ago.

You riggies are amateurs ever at understanding your own paranoia. Many of these same ones will be the ones screaming how the evil rig conspiracy involves the US sites once they play there, just like they did about the site that was built by riggies for riggies (Real Deal Poker) before it shut down.

All of you should never play another hand of online poker, except for the dude who plans to spend money to be a pro in Costa Rica.

All the best.

Worth noting that Real Deal Poker sold my personal information to a third-party after ceasing operations.