Quote:
Originally Posted by 31Alpha
lol .... and AGAIN... what is the RAKE in comparison?? freerolls?
telling rackback % means shat without the rest of the deals!
both rake and rakeback are higher, but with similar percentage, turns out pretty similar to stars in the end if u get a deal. i believe 40%+ flat rb deals don't exist anymore, those are SBR which means if u are a winning player the numbers get cut in half pretty much. i get 35% flat+promos, around 50% total. but the games/traffic are pretty bad
edit: it's similar only if you are supernova on stars. if you are lower, then ipoker rake/rb will be better
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindControl7
^Some sites may offer better effective rake than stars will in 2016, but in the end stars is still way ahead any other poker site overall.
There's more than just rake to a poker site. There's the software, traffic, ease of use, customer support, etc.
that's because people underestimate how much they actually pay in rake, here's what a 0.5bb/100 graph would look like if there was no rake (yellow line=100% rakeback). yeah customer support and ease of use is all very nice...
Last edited by Mike Haven; 12-04-2015 at 01:15 PM.
Reason: 3 posts merged