Quote:
Originally Posted by dean327
My room recently extended tourney re-entry period from 3 levels to 6 levels. At least once per month someone at the table will say that it is a big advantage to buy in at level 6. There will be at least 2 people that will agree.
I try not to LOL.
To be fair, it is an "advantage" for a crappy poker player to buy in at level 6, relatve to the same player buying in at level 1. In other words, crappy poker player buys in at Level 1, his chance of winning is .01%, and if he buys in at level 6, his chance of winning is .02% (percentages exaggerated for effect). Therefore, it's an advantage for him to buy in later; it improves his chances of winning. First, the less hands a crappy poker player participates in against better players, the more good short-term variance can override what would otherwise be guaranteed dead money. Second, the one "skill" that even crappy poker players have is a fairly good understanding of basic starting hand strength, so when the tournament starts turning to short stack flipaments, where you're just shove/folding your 6 big blinds based on fairly easy to remember guidelines, they're no better or worse.
So basically, they're taking away all the potential for their lack of skill to be exploited, and just letting the luck/flipament part determine their fate for 3 hours.
I highly doubt that is the actual argument they make, however. And that the argument they actually make is entirely in line with all of the fun absurd logic that makes this thread so fun.