Quote:
Originally Posted by pkdk
That is because I use vigour and do not have my answer yet
Don't worry, you will figure out a way for you to have the answer you need.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkdk
Are you saying there would be nothing odd about the second test , if it kept producing more under's than the first test?
I am saying the results do not matter at all with regard to how you will misuse and misinterpret them, so you pinpointing a concern of the moment is nothing more than your standard distraction technique from the actual issue. What about two roulette wheels being spun by people of different heights, blah blah blah.
Many people who are experts in this field constantly say your approaches are invalid and your theory is invalid, and how you misinterpret data is invalid. That will continue, regardless of the actual data, because you will keep looking, in your invalid ways, until you get what you need.
If the produced data was genuinely statistically meaningful/concerning in any way you believe, then the experts would have said so. They are experts without an agenda. You are not an expert and you have an obsessive agenda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkdk
I have not veered of track, there is no new insight, this is the same insight I started with. This is still x is not equal to y.
Again, you need not worry - you will mix and match and misuse the data in a way that creates some form of bias for you to believe exists. I have said this enough times knowing it will have zero impact, so at this point I just hope how you butcher their free,
vigorous work done for you is entertaining. Remember, you thought thought watching hands in a play money home game and writing notes on sticky pads would be vigorous
.
All the best.