Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
While it's true with patches, I'm pretty sure it's not true in general. It was a huge plus of why secret pally was so strong.
I don't think so.
Lets just take a look at what thinning your deck actually does. Imagine what happens if you would have the option to thin your deck for no resources at the start of the game by 2 cards.
That means you are playing a 28 card deck. It also means you can cut out 2 of the weakest cards in the deck. This makes the average power level of your cards go up. But by how much? After all, you have access to every card so you should be playing 30 of the strongest cards available to your deck archtype. There would have to be a pretty huge variance in power level in the top 15 cards to see a big difference.
Sure, for secret pally you got to thin out very marginal cards when you cast Mysterious Challenger. But to be able to get that thinning effect, you had to put those marginal cards in there in the first place. If you played normal mid-range pally, you wouldn't have any marginal cards. So saying that MC was good because it thinned out the crap is misleading. The crap was only in there because of the MC. The reason secret pally was strong was because you had a broken curve and because MC gave insane value for a single 6 mana spell.
All in all I think thinning gives a very marginal effect in added value, and unlike our theoretical example, it is never free. The downside of playing Patches is pretty significant. As is the downside of drawing many secrets before MC.
edit:
sorry for rambling, I've wanted to discuss this point with someone for a while now cause I see people saying this on reddit but I'm not going to respond to someone on reddit because why would anyone subject themselves to that
Last edited by Wolfram; 12-12-2016 at 06:50 PM.