lol. All you're left with is saying 'you're so dumb' because every time you've said something else you've just made a fool of yourself.

Like I said. I get why you don't want to keep engaging.

Seek help wil and show this thread to the Dr. I don't mean this in a bullying way either.

+1 reading wils posts shows a clear logical disconnect. He can't see it of course. He would prefer a safe space with toothsayer where they can talk about the racial reasons for the differences in people.

Cyber bullying ftw. I didn't quote all of them but wow. This isn't because you disagree with wil, this is nothing more than trying to embarrass/humiliate/demean someone who has a point of view you don't agree with and you don't like. That is hatred. Social media often encourages this behavior. I mean will could let it go too so I get that point. Carry on. I really wonder what Matt thinks about this exchange.

Lol Adios. I just checked my post and it included a quote of Wil calling us idiots.

But of course that doesn't matter to you...

Anyway, I don't hate Wil at all. My comments are made because Wil is legit dumb as proven by this thread. To be fair though, I also think you're legitimately dumb as well.

Also, I should add that I don't care about people having different opinions of me. I care about people making up their own facts and logic. And I think it's totally worth making fun of those people.

I would think it's obvious to anyone with a shred of objectivity to see what is going on here. You and the rest of the pile-on-crew use the same tactics everywhere. You dislike me and attack me personally. In retaliation I do the same, as I will not just sit back and be insulted.

That being said, you claiming I'm "dumb" is amusing. My position is clear : if it's in the best interest of the child then maybe physical discipline should be used. If you are suggesting I would gain any pleasure out of ever striking a child, you have bigger problems than me.

This is completely untrue and something you desperately want to portray me as. I'm the furthest thing from a racist. To be racist I would have to believe humans are innately different from each other due to genetics. I do not believe that is true, and I've never said anything that would indicate that.

What separates us is culture and cultural attitudes and beliefs. Those things can be changed. Genetics can not.

Note : this is coming from someone who says they agree with a statement but can't think of one example when it could be true.

lol, pointing out that somebody's posts don't make any ****ing sense is not bullying.

Keep ****ing that chicken!

I love the doubling down on not understanding basic logic!

Just shocking that everyone would be agitated by the guy who advocates punching children.

It's not a massive coincidence when everyone comes to the same conclusion about a guy's posts.

I thought my eugenics post was an argument winner.

FMP

I thought midgets having sex would do it. Nope.

The only example you've given in this thread that is the child chasing the ball into the street, and that was to me, but you've since refused to civilly converse with me.

Don't worry, it did.

This will go over wil and adios' head, but: In a game or sport scored by points, the outcome of a winner and loser is independent from all the players knowing how to count.

i mean like duh

I have yet to see reason to "converse" with you. You are a troll, at best. Your entire reason for posting is either to troll it insult someone. What would make you think I'd be interested in that?

Your the one who keeps saying things like these. Everything I've said makes sense in terms of my mindset of this issue. If you could prove to me that in 100% of the cases physical discipline would not be effective, I would obviously agree with you. That can't be done, therefore I can't agree with you.

Wil, this statement shows the problem is with your understanding of logic and nothing to do with your mindset.

Believing 'X if Y' is not the same as believing 'X'. And the truthfulness of 'X if Y' is not the same as the truthfulness of X or Y.

It's really simple.

Here Wil shifts the argument and sets a ridiculous standard. Whether he realises that attempting to prove that in each and every one of the infinite number of hypothetical scenarios of child behaviour that physical discipline is ineffective would be an impossible task or not we can never be sure. He doesn't have much grasp over basic logic, never mind the mild nuances of this statement.

But the main thing is that Wil's standard of "effective" is absolutely absurd and one of the many things in question.

If your kid keeps running into the street then taking a block of wood, a sledgehammer, and inflicting a good old fashioned hobbling of the kid for life would be "effective" in preventing future road incursions. But the standard isn't one of pure efficacy here. Most of us would think that hobbling is still one of the worst approaches.

I mean YOU ALREADY WERE conversing with me... Just scroll back a few pages!

This is an incredible level of disconnect.

Aye, this is where I was going before he abruptly stopped responding to me.

Being as grimly predictable as he is, Wil is of course going to say "Obviously I meant within reason!", and then run around for another few pages refusing to engage about what his standard of reasonable force actually is. He'll likely moan about how it's an example disconnected from reality.

And, of course, he'll keep trying to find reasons not to converse with anyone who confronts him with a problem for his feels.

Have you read any of Wil's posts? Particularly the ones where he is clearly posting drunk? You are on the wrong side of every debate so it is not shocking you take Wil's side. Please go back to posting chain emails.