I'm not disputing that the publisher is sometimes the copyright owner. I'm saying it is irrelevant. A book contract has several steps. The contract is signed. The manuscript is delivered and accepted or rejected. The book is published. Here we are at step 1. The contract is signed, the book hasn't been delivered, let alone accepted. So, at this stage, where the book hasn't even been delivered, you actually think that the publisher can declare that they are ending their relationship with Milo and somehow keep him from publishing the book elsewhere? That's sheer lunacy, it's clearly not how things work.

Someone already said this, but Alex Jones still gets heavy attention and has a ton of followers despite being a Sandy Hook Massacre truther. And, just to be objective and call out leftists too, Roman Polanski has a ton of supporters.

Milo will still have plenty of defenders; book it.

Such a great post.

Thread:

Man, this thread delivers!

Underrated post was when wil said "When I was 14, I would have had sex with any woman under 50yo" and then, completely unbidden, went on to explain that the cap at 50 was arbitrary and was included just so nobody thought that pubescent wil was into old women.

Because I guess *that* would have been weird.

Yes and then the implication that you're sexist if you don't allow some young girl or gay boy the same glorious opportunity. o_O

When I was 14 I'd have had sex with you.

I like to think that I'd have had some say in the matter. But I think we've established that you're not big on this whole consent thing.

Wait Mayo aren't you like 25? wil gotta be 10 years older or so. Yeesh.

wil just when I think you can't possibly get any grosser. You found a way.

Another classic lol wil thread! Bragging about money, gay friends, and how progressive world views are going to cause world war with China. Terrific job wil!!

Another fun thing in this thread today was when someone (fly?) called somebody a Sandy Hook truther and Alan Turing Avatar Mod Guy posted in green text that he was in a "time out" for making fun of the Sandy Hook truther.

Just a fun thread all around.

Oh yeah - I forget that 2p2 posters age.

This isn't correct.

In fact NQ was give a timeout for SH denial.

Good job!

So wil how old are you?

You are wrong about wil's intent he was countering a citing of a LOL okcupid bogus study reaching a ridiculous conclusion by citing another LOL evangelical based bogus study reaching a ridiculous conclusion. Showing how it is obvious that bogus studies can reach any conclusion they want to. Anyone who reads wil's posts knows that at the very least he has little use for religion and its most zealous followers. It should be obvious that he isn't using a study from hard core religious groups to support a position he has. Reading a thread in the other forum people want him banned for this. You folks are LOLtastic in your zeal to validate your emotions in lieu of using a bare minimum amount of critical thinking.

Pretty sure wil is a LOT better poker player than many of his critics.

Being good at poker is not a prerequisite for being a good person or having good ideas.

Hitler would have beaten us all at canasta.

First, wake up to the fact that every time you make a few posts on a controversial subject, most of P and P8.8 erupt in laughter at you; and now you're awake, start trying to work out why that is.

Imo gay men aren't more promiscuous than straight men, it's just that women aren't as promiscuous and therefore it's not as easy for a straight man to get laid. Imagine if every single/unattached woman on the street was DTF. There would be LOTS more ****ing.

That's what it's like for gay/bi men, they can get laid whenever they want. A reasonably attractive male can go on Grindr right now and find someone to give him a BJ within like 15 minutes, for free. Can you find me 10 straight single guys who wouldn't like head right now from an attractive female (for free and with zero effort)?

So your claim is Wil isn't bad at math he's bad at explaining what the hell he's doing? Because it sure seemed he believed those numbers he was quoting. And why is OK Cupid automatically a bogus source of data? Did anyone saying their data is no good get past their name and look at how the study was done and find problems with it?