You are the nut-low of SMpers. Basically, you are human trash. Before you whine about my post being zero content... regard that your post is equally so.

(removed image --wn)

Lets not post pictures of ****, if you don't mind :P

The "big five" is super soft play-doh science when taken beyond a way to collect data, but this doesn't seem to upset our "the soft sciences are stupid" crowd when someone like Jordan Peterson crows about them endlessly.

Self-help sounds like something you have to cooperate with your self well to do well at helping your self. Women are superior therefore at self help thanks to dude-bros science facts on cooperative biologicals. He can't help himself due to young maleness biologically or no? Yes he can?!!!

Touche, that's fair.

And I'll admit his citation link game started off strong. It wasn't until the 4th or 5th that he made one that contradicted his point, and wasn't until much later that he started linking the NYPost and the like.

When I have more time I'll probably read through the thing but if he's trying to use aggregate big-5 personality test results to suggest that women are just not suited to tech industry jobs then I will laugh heartily. That's the impression I'm getting. Maybe it's wrong. I haven't had time to pay attention to this yet.

One of my favorite things FoldN does when he gets all righteous is he keeps citing the same ****ing source over and over again like it's a different source each time, because he has literally no respect for his readers and the toxic mix of severe developmental disabilities and drug abuse make him incapable of participating in a real discussion.

Also, again again again this is one of those things that literally a child would've gotten right...

Why the **** is he doing interviews with Jordan Peterson and Stefan Molyneux?

Like libs are "hey this is all coded bigotry, typical white male internet reactionary bull****", FoldN and Jiggy inexplicably decide to lie about the content of the memo and make it seem like he's making a bunch of non-controversial, unobjectionable points(but is also boldly challenging the echo chamber? Ah, nevermind)...


"Dr." Damore kinda seems like exactly what we said he was!

A few of the SMPers seem to have turned on spanky. It's an interesting development.

Really? Who me? A few? Which personality types are they? Are they cooperating like women? Is it the king of the science-philosophy hill gang acting like young males*?

Care to back that up. Seems that the Big Five is THE SCIENTIFICALLY accepted theory of human personality in the field. But what do PhDs in psychology know?

I know you won't watch this, but here is science you're going to need to refute:

You know it's true because of the ALL CAPS.

PersonalityExpert suddenly appears!!!

Fair enough. And that assertion to you is sexist?

We don't discuss science, remember. You think it's all a huge "leftist" conspiracy to push some agenda. I'm not interested in that conversation.

I bet they drive worse than men too, especially the Oriental ones!

The "male alt-science" scene emerging from the women-telling memo martyr really has "personalities" types driving it.

Bladesman87: "Catfood"

if you arent consulting your wife for your opinion could you ask her about the situation and post her opinion separately? it would be interesting to hear the husband wife combo of opinion in a relationship where the wife is a pro in a SJW field

Okay. So because you don't think is settled, it shouldn't be talked about, and any attempt to bring it up should result in a pillorying, show trial and swift kick out the door? That's what happened, and it's increasingly happening anywhere the current social justice movement gets its hooks sunk in deep enough.

Scott Alexander wrote up pretty good blog post addressing the memo and women in tech, summing up:


And after Fly does his routine of attacking Scott for being just an aspy racist with a blog, I again will implore Well Named and Original Position to weigh in here on why they still agree with guys like Tom Demain that this issue is not worth taking seriously, and that the Fly's of the world have not taken control of your movement, steering it straight into the ice burg.

Scott also lays out some evidence of this in the last section of the blog:

And will continue spreading until right-minded people start to recognize it:

edited: No telling people to die, 6ix

The example of him denying any gender gap in pay for the same work is more of an example of him being wrong. When you combine it with his misuse of the personality data to suggest that any gender gap in tech is biological in nature, then, yes, I can see being offended by that characterization.

Going back to the Quillette article you linked, I'm pretty much saying the same thing as David P. Schmidt:

I've also seen a lot of strawman arguments saying that the left thinks women and men are exactly equal. Maybe some believe that, but the far more common view is that the differences don't matter much, if at all.

I will never turn on you Spanky. But I'd ask you to remember when guys like Trolly and his ilk did, having you demodded for supporting "racists" and eventually having you exiled for "gibberish." These are the people who are ruining the movement you sincerely support.

There is almost ZERO observable gender gap in pay - which is also illegal and anyone getting paid less for the same work based on their gender has recourse to sue. Stop discrediting yourself.