**** huds

Ok , good post..

There is validity to what your saying but I think there is a ton of validity to what I said. If you're objective and honest then u have to admit what I said. . I'm not going to argue the "self evident"

Most people are just nits around here and would feel very comfortable working for our brave and glorious leader Obama's ministry of officially sanctioned government information.. talk about spin and ignoring the self evident..

What about seat scrpters.

What the actual hell is this post.

I really, really need to ask you this. If you feel huds and seat scrips are of such an advantage why do you not get them yourself? And please keep in mind that if a site does not ban them then people using them are not in the wrong, they are only trying gain an advantage over the competition and make no mistake about it, poker is a competition. If you really just want to have fun then winning or losing shouldn't really matter. If you want to compete and possibly be a winner then get to work and improve yourself. I guess it really is easier to blame others for your failures than to look at yourself in the mirror and realize the problem is right in front of you.

No ****. Objectively, banning HUDs hurts recs more than grinders, because grinders can still beat the **** out of recs with no HUD, while recs losing their HUD means they lose whatever advantage it gave them.

Let's use a golf analogy: Who does banning long putters impact more, PGA Pros who can more easily adapt to a traditional putter, or 70 year old men who use the long putters to help their backs?