Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Wray
i asked that question last night and a few yanks started getting defensive about their own personal situation (typical) and offensive about me (im doing just fine ppl).
..tyty for a constructive answer.
Fwiw, i fully agree with what you said. Too many people on this site blame "variance". My understanding of it from my own POV is primarily as you said it: too much 'bad or marginal play'.
Hä?
Your understanding of "it" (variance, downswing) is primarly 'bad or marginal play'?
Maybe im feeding the troll here, but I will try it and give a "constructive" answer:
A downswing is when you roll out a dice 1000 times and just get a six 90 times. It's the bad side of variance.
And believe me: your dice doesnt make marginal plays nor is he emotionaly affected.
And: of course a downswing can influence your game, but this doesnt affect your downswing, it affects your results (and the probability of bigger variance).
Why shouldn't I blame variance? I played the superturbos some time ago, this means push-fold from the very beginning. So the most important luckfactor in these is all-in-ev. I was running near 100BI below All-In EV. Why shouldnt I "blame" variance and consider me unlucky if a proven 99.99% of all players are running better than me? I still know it doesnt change anything, but I still think why tf are all these guys more lucky than me? As long as this doesnt affect the game i feel its ok.
Coming from switzerland, I'm (per definition) completely neutral, and believe me: from a neutral standpoint, you look much more douchey as all the dumb ("yanks" or not) hu-regs who posted...