Quote:
Originally Posted by OldManCoffee66
Started from the beginning and still just a few pages into the journey.
Found the early posts on chess to be interesting.
Middling chess player myself, but I find the history and strategy addictive.
It is probably why I find poker and dynasty sports so enjoyable.
Curious after all this time where have you found similarities? Training, strategy etc...
hey, welcome to the thread!
i saw this, but i missed the question at the end initially.
is there anything specific you are curious about, sir? please lmk
my insight on chess vs poker hasn’t evolved too much in the time since i’ve answered this previously.. buried somewhere.
fwiw ( nothing
)
chess > poker: the difficulty of competition
chess > poker: difficulty in becoming competitive
chess > poker: difficulty to reach the top few percentiles
chess > poker: time investment required to master
chess > poker: mental difficulty
***
poker > chess: emotional difficulty
****
poker is similar to chess: the complexity and beauty of the game
—————-
in my opinion, the most significant difference between the chess & poker world is in terms of the people you interact with irl - not the games themselves.
while there’s significantly more money in poker than in chess - poker as a career pales in comparison (financially) to many lucrative careers, IMO. And these more desirable careers are far more accessible to the people crushing chess (esp nowadays) than poker if they are interested.
being friends with chess prodigies or brilliant and driven people can be its little bubble. this is something i overlooked the magnitude of before pro poker, where i've been forced to spend significantly more time with people who don’t fit this archetype. i would actively resist those interactions growing up. this spoke more to my insecurity and avoidance of discomfort than anything.
many people in these circles will be millionaires in their twenties via real jobs (+ high upward mobility & leverage). then there are others (like mr hans moke niemann, or ms alex botez) that are either playing or streaming chess for a living presently.
these are some of the kindest and most genuine people you will ever meet, and they didn’t necessarily grow up rich (as many would presume) as a collective.
I’ve learned to appreciate how inf rare some of these friendships are, and it remains my favorite part of my chess experiences.
i do think the camaraderie within high-stakes poker replicates this to a lesser extent, which is partially why this pursuit is desirable to me over an isolating corporate career.
hope these ramblings were insightful to someone