Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
I recently re-watched Woody Allen's Manhattan. His character (early 40's) is dating/****ing a 17 year old. It was kinda weird watching a 70s movie thru a 20s lense. Not sure if this stuff was make-believe-its-just-a-movie / standard at the time / is still now / or what.
GcluelessingeneralnoobG
I'd guess Woody isn't in the dark on that.
I'm biased in favor of Mia Farrow's version of the story, but she does seem a little nuts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
538, which I trust more than the betting markets which are dominated by homers, not sharps, has Biden's chances of winning Texas at 34%. Not likely, but not a pipe dream.
WEll that's the thing, I would take Nate Silver's odds on some things if he was actually laying them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
Cool. You can take it at 2-1 with me for as much as you want.
Farhaclause is here.
I’m not really trying to hammer you (this time), but when people make statements like this that they aren’t willing to bet on- to me it’s completely useless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewAcctIsBest
my friend is looking to bet $1k on biden vs $2k on trump, I can guarantee it or escrow. He is a well known poker player just likes his privacy. lmk I can book on here or via PMs. I can also just give you his number assuming he is ok with that
***- Got it garick I wont do any politarding
I spent all summer looking for someone to lay me 2:1 on a Trump bet, and mentioned it here. NOW there's virtually no time left for Biden to stumble and Trump is drawing to a few unpredictable anomalies [again].
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny_on_the_spot
be that as it may, we'll find out in 2022 and 2024
I'd bet the party that wins next week gets killed in 2022.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cushlash
It doesn't have to be a purely monetary bet. Its about having skin in the game. That can be money but it doesn't have to be, money is just usually the easiest way to get skin in the game.
An extreme non-monetary example is airline pilots. They aren't betting money that they'll get you to your destination safely, not directly at least. But they are in the same plane as you so if they **** up then they die also. Would you ride in an airplane where the pilot was controlling the plane remotely from the safety of the ground? I wouldn't.
I think sports announcers and political pundits who constantly say dumb **** that turns out to be wrong on average should be fired but that's not the way the media works so you end up with the same idiots spouting the same nonsense year after year. Yet another reason I can't stand most sports announcers or any of these shows on ESPN anymore. There's no accountability.
You might argue that your reputation taking a hit due to being wrong is also skin in the game but in practice it seems like unless you're a public figure, and usually even if you are (see: sports announcers), there never seems to be any real reputation consequences to being wrong. No one tracks it unless there's something tangible on the line so its too easy to deny, make excuses or rationalize when you're wrong and escape with your rep unscathed.
People are obviously allowed to express their opinions without having any skin in the game, I just think its soft af and if you say something and someone else offers to bet against it and you say no then whatever you said is simply worthless noise.
I get Amarillo Slim's old adage
bet on it or shut up.
You're a gambler and are used to it. Many people would never consider being like Slim.