Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
Over has hit.
I've always wondered why they call it the "Prevent" Defense when it doesn't prevent anything and usually leads to the other team just scoring a touchdown without much difficulty...
I didn’t watch the game so I’m not sure what exactly happened, but the Prevent D is meant to stop big play touchdowns by keeping all the offensive players in front of the defenders. Typically time is a factor, so a Precent D will also cover out patterns, giving receivers easy catches in the middle of the field to prevent clock stoppages while sacrificing yardage.
Jim Schwartz, Eagles D coordinater/former HC, loves to play “sticks D” on longer 3rd downs, which is a form of the Prevent D where most of the secondary starts with their defensive positioning at the 1st down marker, with the similar points to above. What is hilariously awful about it though is that teams routinely will end up with 4th and 2 or less because the Eagles sacrifice a big chuck of yardage underneath to stop a pass to a receiver past the 1st down line. The team sometimes will then go for it on 4th down, converting some % of the time. I guess the question is do teams convert a 1st down on the 2 plays more than they would with the defense playing a conventional D, which I don’t have the answer to.
I think in general, most people are not fans of the Prevent D (I am not), but I would liken it to poker where most people don’t understand nuances of the game. A spot where a good player might fold a really really strong hand because the opponent really should only have a stronger hand looks insane to people who are bad at poker but makes sense to better players. I would guess Prevent D is similar.