Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range

09-16-2016 , 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
Your game plays *a lot* differently than mine if you basically expect the limpers to fold 100% of the time (if I've interpreted your guesstimating correctly) where there are 4 players ~200bb+ deep.

I'm also not sold on the 3bet / raise / call rankings at all.

In the end, we knowing created an SPR 3.7 pot and have now flopped TP2K on a drawy board. For better or worse, I don't think there is anything to think about postflop (PSB flop to setup turn shove, never fold). If there is something to think about, then we shouldn't be 3betting this hand to begin with, imo.

ETA: I don't know if I'm out to lunch or not, but I hate all the sizing suggestions on the flop. We have an SPR less than 4 on a drawy board. No draw ever folds the flop (seriously, right?), so get max value from them with a PSB bet. Drawing out this board over 3 streets of postflop betting (where we should feel committed, even perhaps when a terrible card comes) seems bad, as does setting up an awkward stack on the turn (where a PSB leaves us with a trivial < PSB shove, and everything else leaves us with a lol amount for the river in a committed spot).

Gcompletelyoutofstepwiththeforum,onceagainG
You're right about the draws.

But we don't get light calls by [1p, pp] type hands with a pot sized bet in a 3b pot.

So long as we bet at least 1/2 pot and get a call, we'll have no trouble getting stacks in OTT.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapidator
So long as we bet at least 1/2 pot and get a call, we'll have no trouble getting stacks in OTT.
A 1/2 PSB of $70 leaves us with $425 left in a $275 pot, so a bit of an overshove for the turn, plus giving fairly decent 3:1 odds to a flush draw (which ain't great if we're feeling committed, which we should be imo).

Gjustsayin'G
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 01:11 PM
Oops, yes, I had the stacks remaining $100 less.

Agreed, 1/2 pot makes it a tough shove OTT.

$400 into $300 with draws still calling isn't unreasonable though.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 01:19 PM
Putting in 200bb with TPGK after V opened 8x over a couple limps seems like a good way to burn money unless V is a massive fish that will pay off with worse.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wj94
Putting in 200bb with TPGK after V opened 8x over a couple limps seems like a good way to burn money unless V is a massive fish that will pay off with worse.

I mostly agree except draws. Read in op is that 8x sizing may be consistent with a very wide late position open. If that's the case v is only likely felting with 2p+ and strong draws.

He should have a bunch of bluff catchy stuff that wants to peel and some spazz able stuff.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
A 1/2 PSB of $70 leaves us with $425 left in a $275 pot, so a bit of an overshove for the turn, plus giving fairly decent 3:1 odds to a flush draw (which ain't great if we're feeling committed, which we should be imo).



Gjustsayin'G

Which is why you fold pre. I get it.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
Which is why you fold pre. I get it.
Well, I think it's kinda in tune with what WJ said too. I mean, it seems like a large part of the reason we 3bet preflop was for value, and now we've hit TP, and now all of a sudden we're worried it's not for value? We can't have it both ways, imo. If we raised preflop in large part for value, time to go to value town ASAP on pretty much the best flop we can get; otherwise (and I'm in this boat), we shoulda just folded to begin with.

GimoG
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 02:10 PM
grunch:
3! to $75 pre lead flop for $110. it's a flop you should be cbetting a lot so make it look like you want fold equity imo.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
I mostly agree except draws. Read in op is that 8x sizing may be consistent with a very wide late position open. If that's the case v is only likely felting with 2p+ and strong draws.

He should have a bunch of bluff catchy stuff that wants to peel and some spazz able stuff.
Hero's range looks like AK/KK+ betting this flop and bombing brick turns. If V gets it in for 200bb, we probably aren't going to win too often unless, as said, V is a massive fish.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
I prefer to keep our bet otf capped at 2/3 pot (or a little less) this keeps those weaker holdings in, keeps us a little shy of committing just yet and still gets decent value from his range.

Nut Spade draws are getting a decent price to see the turn but they have no implied odds as I'm folding to turn leads on an A or a spade.

I like 70-80 here.
No more than this, and closer to half pot is prob an ideal sizing with your whole range. KQo would be bet-f in straightforward 1-3 game with a few player dependent exceptions.

Not sure you realize, but hand v range, AQss>>>KQo on this flop in both equity and playability.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanaplan



Not sure you realize, but hand v range, AQss>>>KQo on this flop in both equity and playability.

Of course I know that. It's why I stated my thoughts on how elastic he might be and that it should influence our sizing decision (not just one combo) but his entire range. But you clipped that out of your quote.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
Of course I know that. It's why I stated my thoughts on how elastic he might be and that it should influence our sizing decision (not just one combo) but his entire range. But you clipped that out of your quote.
... I meant OP, sorry ��

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyBuz

The area I struggle with is when we have a hand like AQ, does that specific combo make for a better bet or check back?
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 04:04 PM
pre is whatever
135 on the flop
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amanaplan
... I meant OP, sorry ��

Gotcha. No worries.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 05:01 PM
should we have any made hands in our flop check range?
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyBuz
If I had to quantify the three options I'd say:

3! >>>>> call > fold
I get lollive and all that, but KQo is somewhere near the bottom of a defending range, which, along with it's blockers, makes it sexy as a 3bet. Something like 3!=call=fold seems closer to me. Without a plan, I'd probably go fold>3!>call.

What is our goal with iso this guy? Nothing in the read suggests he's lolbad. Are we expecting to make a near immediate profit due to a large pre r/f range? Anyway, my point is I'd like to know how I'm planning to exploit villain if I'm gonna iso him. If the info is in the op and I missed it, apologies.

We can bet big on the flop if he's mostly gonna x/jam his draws here. Again, from OP, I don't know what we're expecting, what range Villain is putting us on, etc.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrybe
should we have any made hands in our flop check range?
KK?

Villain has a lot of draw combos here. idk
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrybe
should we have any made hands in our flop check range?
KX with a spade would definitely be better candidates than KQ no spade, assuming we don't want to just bluffcatch all KQ.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suited fours



What is our goal with iso this guy? Nothing in the read suggests he's lolbad..

Do you even regwar bruh?
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
Do you even regwar bruh?
regwar strat on this flop has gotta be a merged stack off over 2 streets right?
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suited fours
What is our goal with iso this guy? Nothing in the read suggests he's lolbad. Are we expecting to make a near immediate profit due to a large pre r/f range?
Well...

Quote:
He does things like open 52s to $25 from UTG
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suited fours
regwar strat on this flop has gotta be a merged stack off over 2 streets right?

Super reg fish mayhaps.

Otherwise bet frop X turn call river if he bets and bet like a missed draw if he checks and get bluff caught 92.3% of the time if he didn't back into a ******ed 2p on the free river card obv.


cAfpsAm
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyBuz

Flop ($135): K 7 6
I don't know nor did I read anything after this point

This is kinda why I little girly like lean towards a fold. This spot is so hairy it's prehistoric. Flop: You've put yourself in a position where no matter how you slice it's gonna be marginal and big ol ? You may lose your stack with real dilemna to AK, KK, AA, unless we remove AA KK bc of what you said about him 4! On top of it, yes you have to hope he doesn't already have you beat/crushed, and you're still looking at a dangerously wet board where you have to make decisions for your stack (200+BB) and hope your a slight-ok favorite.
All I can say is thank god you have position, or there's no way you make it out alive long-term.

The fact that most of us are in agreement that the spot PF was Fold, 3!, or call acceptable says to me it's not really that EV+ any of the ways. So, since I like easy decisions cause that is top dog EV+ I think I would have just folded.

It's tough though, it's so tough, I am in pain as to what I should be doing as a winning poker player. (what a winning poker player should do at 1/3)

I hate calling though PF, seems like a decently thinking Villian, which seems he is? ---- Calling, our hand is face up, TT or less, Broadways and JT. and you're odd 98s.


Fold > 3! > Call Idk, I have to think about it; as to what is best.



Follow UP: You're never getting money in and you're a big favorite unless he has KJ or KT or K9s. Not after you 3! That's a bad spot.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapidator
I would not check KQ here. I would check AK+.

Bet 2/3 pot. $85-95. Puke call a raise.

I don't understand this?


Why are you willing to put and call-back money into the pot with a worse hand?

You b/c with QK?

You x/c with AK?


Why?
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote
09-16-2016 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
Your game plays *a lot* differently than mine if you basically expect the limpers to fold 100% of the time (if I've interpreted your guesstimating correctly) where there are 4 players ~200bb+ deep.

I'm also not sold on the 3bet / raise / call rankings at all.

In the end, we knowing created an SPR 3.7 pot and have now flopped TP2K on a drawy board. For better or worse, I don't think there is anything to think about postflop (PSB flop to setup turn shove, never fold). If there is something to think about, then we shouldn't be 3betting this hand to begin with, imo.

ETA: I don't know if I'm out to lunch or not, but I hate all the sizing suggestions on the flop. We have an SPR less than 4 on a drawy board. No draw ever folds the flop (seriously, right?), so get max value from them with a PSB bet. Drawing out this board over 3 streets of postflop betting (where we should feel committed, even perhaps when a terrible card comes) seems bad, as does setting up an awkward stack on the turn (where a PSB leaves us with a trivial < PSB shove, and everything else leaves us with a lol amount for the river in a committed spot).

Gcompletelyoutofstepwiththeforum,onceagainG



It's like... we're never laying down this hand on flop ever, we 3!ed, we flopped top pair, we can't bail cause we're scared of AK, so we're hoping he calls us with KJ or KT, but is he really stacking off with KJ or KT after we've 3!ed? And is he really going to go stack off with us without a decent draw when we have last aggression, so he's not gonna donk, he's gonna wait for us to bet. And if he has a decent draw, at least 35% equity, that is our summit. Our absolute best-case scenario is 64% equity, seems nauseating to me.

It just seems like in this spot 200BB+ deep, he's never gonna be putting substantial money into pot post-flop unless we're hung or at best slightly favored. EV+ is EV+. But I hate competing for spots that are so thin in the first place. Maybe I'm wrong though, idk. It just seems the way this hand/spots are one finds himself in a spot where you're gonna be really uncertain no matter what.


This is a really really really thought-provoking hand.



My gut has me saying the right move by a competent poker player is 3! and re-evaluating post-flop, but my gut's really nauseous trying to play it.




Follow Up: The majority of the time were taking down this pot is when he folds the flop cause we just folded out worse.
PAHWM: 1/3 NL - RIO Hand on the Button vs. Potentially Wide CO Isolation Range Quote

      
m