beat the clocks

my party tables are not working

I need more information. What skin? What tables? All tables? Only cash? Only tournaments?

Please use the menu item for "Help -> Diagnostic -> Get Window Title" and paste me the results for your main party lobby and also for each table that fails.

Also, what does "not working" mean? There are many things that could 'not work'.. What do you expect to happen? And what happens instead?

title=[$3,000 Gtd: Featherweight (132779961) Table #18 - NL Hold'em - $5.50 Buy-in],class=[#32770]

title=[$3,000 Gtd Super Knockout: Featherweight (132818781) Table #34 - NL Hold'em - $11 Buy-in],class=[#32770]

title=[partypoker: Poker Lobby - Good luck hodgeisback ],class=[#32770]

The tables do not react at all, They do not place into my grid. Have only tried mtts.

Classic party poker for skin, hopefully that is what you need

Thanks

Yep. Hrmm, everything there looks ok on first glace. I will see if I can find anything..

Are you sure your lobby was opened before you pressed Start? As in #1 here:
http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/help/partypoker

Just closed and reopened the client and it works now, sorry about that

Thanks for the help

alright cool, glad to know the software isnt completely broken

thanks for the customer support again, this is a great product and when u have a problem he does what he can to help you

hi,

when I visualize my grid, is there a way for me to get my slot 2, 3 and 4 a different size than slot 1?

thx

Hi,

The soft dont work after room change the soft in unibet, there is something to do?

THXS

Maybe follow their rules and don't use third-party software?

Unfortunately all slots in SaT must be the same size.

If you want to change all of your grid slot sizes, you'll need to create a File->New Layout

The built-in site for "Unibet" was for v1 of their software. I see they just recently released v2.

However, I have been contacted by a Unibet representative and they advised me that their pokersite doesn't allow any 3rd party software. The rep agreed that my software isn't malicious but they have a hard and fast rule. He warned that if players are caught using ANY helper softwares, they could risk having their accounts banned.

I haven't decided yet what I'm going to do, but its very likely that I will not support Unibet any longer. That would mean that I remove the current "Unibet" site which works for v1 of their software, and also I will not be adding support for v2 of their new software. I don't want my players/customers to have their accounts banned.

Of course, SaT has a Custom Site Wizard (by choosing 'Other' from the Sites dropdown), where anyone can add support for any other site they want that isn't officially supported. You could try that if you wanted to. But realize you are taking a big risk if you are caught

Apparently this^ is the user who tipped Unibet off about my software, which caused them to personally contact me. Blame him

But I wasn't trying to circumvent any rules anyway.. Enough customers requested Unibet support and thats why I originally added it. I legitimately didn't know they had this rule. I think its probably best for my software to stay within the rules. Of course, it could be bad for business if competitors come in and offer Unibet support. Then I may reconsider my position

I'd posted in here over a year ago as someone had asked about the site (hence why you were in my subscribed threads on mobile), you replied:
Did you add support after that or did you lie at that point?

I use software on any sites that allow it, it absolutely sucks though when only players willing to break rules have those advantages. See Party's current hand history/hud fiasco. So yeah, if you try to help players cheat you're going to get called out on it.

I just looked up when Unibet support was officially added, and it was May 6, 2016. So I guess I did not lie at that point.

I must not have remembered about that rule or your post when I added support. I don't really follow many of these smaller sites and I truthfully I don't like adding support for them. Its usually more headaches than its worth for the handful of customers who will actually use it.

I think at that time I just pushed something out quickly to satisfy some people. Because looking at my code, I didn't even have any tests for that site written. So I probably didn't really think about it much, whereas now I've thought about it some more.

I still don't disagree with my quote at all. It is up to the users to follow the terms of the site. Its not up to me or any software. I could release support for whatever I want without any ramifications from anyone. My only obligation is to my customers.

Or see Stars/Party/iPoker/888/etc/etc and Seating Scripts. I assume you're sending reps after all of them just the same. Or maybe not, because you're not personally affected. I would be upset about seating scripts if I couldn't afford them or couldn't get access to them. Same with some of the jesus softwares where people can pull up exact ranges based on the cards and actions at the current hand. But SaT doesn't provide those advantages.

You're well within your right to complain. But don't kid yourself about your intent: you simply feel that you're at a disadvantage and want it evened out. That's fine. I've made my choice about how I intend to handle it going forward, and its in your favor.

Save the hyperbole for NVG or BBV. "Breaking a site's TOS" is much different than "cheating". No one using SaT is "cheating" by any sense of the term. SaT doesn't help you be a better player. It helps you automate some tedious annoyances and makes playing more comfortable. In fact, if you're a bad player, using SaT would probably only make you worse and lose money faster, since you're playing more hands/hr at -EV.

The Unibet rep explicitly told me that he has no problem with the features of my software. He just said that they must maintain the hard rule otherwise its a legal mess trying to figure out what should be allowed or not.

In fact, some would argue that gameplay suffers as you add more tables, in which case having your opponents using SaT to play more tables would benefit you, if it turned a winner to breakeven or a breakeven to a loser.

Its also more rake for the site. And banning players from their site is also -EV for them. So, while it would be interesting to see what they would actually do, its just not worth the hassle

Of course that's my intent, why wouldn't it be? You mentioned it elsewhere in the post but it has the potential to end up like scripting on 888, they say it's against the rules but never enforce it - creating a very annoying uneven playing field.

But anyway, sorry if I offended. Just seems like every site nowadays has their own "grey area" where players are breaking rules and getting away with it.

Fair enough. I don't envy the pokersites, they are in a difficult position. Of course, anyone can just privately hire someone to build them any software they want, further complicating the problem. Unfortunately that is the evolution of technology, and ultimately I don't think anything can be done to stop it. I wrote one blog post about this on the SaT site

It wasn't him - I believe I sent you a PM before it ever appeared in the Unibet thread. I found this thread by searching for the term Unibet on 2 + 2.

If any of your competitors offer Unibet, then let me know, and I will talk to them too.

I agree on your later point that people can build software only for themselves. There're some things we can do about that, but it certainly makes it harder. I have a standing €50 bounty for anyone who can point me to a HUD or tracker that I don't know about which functions on our site though. As with anything in security, the aim is to make it hard to break the rules, you can rarely make it impossible.

v2.92

changelog:
http://www.stackandtile.com/forum/sh...d=7846#pid7846

http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/

Hello,

Stackandtile is not working today and the site is not working. Do you guys have some issues ?

The site may have been down temporarily. Is everything ok now?

At MTTs after blind level 500/1000 is reached it stops to work, i have hotkey for bet 2.2BB and it puts in betbox 2.20

Have same problem on 888 tables with custom site and 888 mod. Before it was working fine but recently it stopped working after 500/1000. At 888 it puts in betbox 220. It might have been my fault tho as I recently bought bigger monitor and changed layout a bit but I am not 100% sure.

Sent PM with screenshots, config and custom 888 site.

This was a bug because Winamax adds the comma and the blinds are really "500-1,000" and SaT couldn't detect it. Also Winamax eventually goes to "1.25k-2.50k" which SaT missed as well.

Please try this version v2.92a:
http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/tmp/...Setup-292a.exe

and let me know if it works

This is the same problem, but SaT can detect the commas for 888 with the built-in site. But your custom 888 site obviously doesn't have those settings. I'll PM them to you.

What you're seeing is a problem with how Windows 10 hides the resizing borders of the windows. Its not an issue, other than some visual gaps that you see. Full explanation here:
http://www.stackandtile.com/forum/sh...d=7263#pid7263

Is this still an issue? I just looked now and it seems the popup is different now, and it includes a checkbox to "dont show this popup again"