Open Side Menu Go to the Top

12-16-2021 , 07:19 PM
“I’m a very smart business woman”
-Something smart business people say all the time
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD
12-16-2021 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by younguns87
loooooooool at this jury

Sandra smiling somewhere. I can’t even fathom how people thought Erika was deserving.
The same people that think Sandra deserved her first win and Russell deserved to lose.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King~of~Diamonds
The 20 and 30 somethings just dont really respect anyone younger and they dont want to reward that person if they can avoid it.

Spencer got 0 votes in a pretty excellent game. Because he was 20-whatever in a cast of 30s and 40s.

It’s kind of a mental block people have.

Maybe someday we will have a pioneer who will pave the way as our first young-American to win Survivor
100% this. Olders absolutely can not stand a kid getting one over on them.

"Theyve still got a lot to learn"
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King~of~Diamonds
Maybe someday we will have a pioneer who will pave the way as our first young-American to win Survivor
Who is youngest ever winner? That Adam guy was pretty young.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
Who is youngest ever winner? That Adam guy was pretty young.
https://screenrant.com/survivor-ten-youngest-winners/
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by housenuts
Who is youngest ever winner? That Adam guy was pretty young.
Hannah got robbed. (She’s younger)
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King~of~Diamonds
Anyway, great cast and they somehow bungled it into a below average season.
This sums it up well for me too.
The editors deserve a lot of the blame imo
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:42 PM
Hannah took nearly 15 minutes to vote at the first tribal she went to and that likely contributed massively to people thinking she was a bad player and she was never really able to recover from that.

On this season, the reality is that Xander just didn't have a very good social game. Yeah it was always going to be very tough for him to win because of his age but he needed to form stronger connections with people other than Ricard and maybe Evvie. Also him not putting himself into fire making and beating Erika was a bad move. Erika played a smart UTR game and was up against two people who had poor social games and that's why she won.

I enjoyed this season, but they definitely cast a few too many bad players. Tiffany being the only player over 35 who had a clue how to play was a bit of a misstep by production, and hopefully the older people on 42 are better.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyboy
Obviously we differ on the Russell idea because Samoa IMO was the first time that the jury changed the game by voting an undeserving winner because they were butthurt they all got smoked by him all the way through.

But Erika luckboxed onto a dominant tribe and had nothing to do before merge. Then the only reason she got voted into the hourglass situation is because she was on the bottom and they all knew it. After merge she was such a nothing that nobody even cared she was still around and I don't think she even came close to winning a challenge? She was only "in control" because of the other people playing around her who essentially overlooked her because she wasn't a threat. And that wasn't a strategy by her, as much as she might want people to think it was. Xander getting zero votes doesn't surprise me, but giving it to the other person who just happens to crawl into FTC even though they barely did anything to get there always leaves a sour taste in my mouth results wise.

And I don't even have to watch the aftershow to know it was a bunch of woke talk about a POC winning who is also a woman. Hooray for CBS.
Based on the TV edit for Samoa I can see why you'd think that. But Russell got a great edit in Samoa and they hid how awful he was to people. He would laugh at people he'd just voted out when they went to grab their torch for instance and he was obviously pretty sexist too. No one wants to give the money to a twat like that.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bidz
This sums it up well for me too.

The editors deserve a lot of the blame imo
Focused on woke survivor instead of editing it properly. Don't necessarily want to blame the editors since they were probably instructed to make it woke.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy_Tomich969
Also him not putting himself into fire making and beating Erika was a bad move.
Been thinking about this and obviously is his best win equity option, but if it's still 100k 2nd, 50k 3rd and dust for the remainder, as an assumedly poor 20 year he mighta just wanted to secure the bag and get that 50/100 with a chance of winning, rather than risking getting 10k or whatever the give the rest.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 11:17 PM
Did Xander get 3rd place because he is a white male? Weak
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 11:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banana man
Did Xander get 3rd place because he is a 20 year old white male? Weak
Fyp
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 11:36 PM
Some people have really watched 41 seasons of these shows and blame the jury on semi-close decisions. You don't understand the show after all these years....
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-16-2021 , 11:40 PM
Blame Canada
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symbioticse
It was a substantive response, I guess I was hoping for a debate from the people in this thread specifically for why he was so robbed. Maybe 3 posts looks like an obsession - it's not like I'm on the thread all the time I make posts here as the episodes air, I actually totally agree that his game was good for a 20 year old I was just talking about it in a comparative sense. As far as twitter and survivor facebook goes it seems like it was an extremely popular opinion. Which I disagreed with.

I found this forum watching HvV again and the debates there were really indepth so I guess I thought this was the place. Also it doesn't really take more than 3 minutes to put up that wall of text. Could've condenced my argument more.
See, most of the support I saw for Xander on Survivor twitter was from people rooting for him to survive another week because he was on the bottom and Liana made that over-the-top comment about literally hating his face. It may seem silly, but I think anytime a player says something like that you will have a decent % of fans rally around the Xander in that situation unless the person is being a huge jerk to everyone.

And I realize you haven't been posting nonstop about Xander ITT- your takes on him just seemed overly negative/biased about someone who I think played a decent game.

*Oh, and I don't subject myself to Survivor facebook (shudders), so I can't speak to any discussion there.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 12:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringbckMichelleYi
Totally shocked by that result. Thought there was 0% they were going to give their first female winner in 7 seasons a totally invisible pre merge.

Probably why people on this forum have a bizarre opinion the person literally just won the game in a 7-1 vote is somehow a 'goat'. Maybe because shes a small female as well as not having a prominent edit?

The whole point of a goat is they are dragged to the end as an easy beat and lose. See Russell Hantz. A goat has never won Survivor.

Absolutely chuffed with that result as I love to be surprised and proven wrong. After the influx of advantages I was very low on the season but the ending for me has completely saved it.
Your post last week about being convinced that Deshawn would win unanimously felt a bit like emotional hedging to me. I know you were very confident about Michelle winning last season as well, and I'm sure you were disappointed when she got blanked. IIRC after Tony won you didn't say anything about him playing well, just posted something about how men had won 6 times in a row and gotten almost all the jury votes during that run.

*Erika did get an odd edit for a winner, though I think that's partly because Shan dominated so much of the screen time early on.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 01:10 AM
I was fine with Erika as the winner. Under the radar is not a terribly sexy style, but it's a valid method for certain types. If you can get taken to the end by someone else, and then crush that person in jury votes, you must have done something right...or the person who took you did something quite terribly wrong. It seems fire making glory is perhaps not that big of a deal on one's resume in hindsight.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 02:12 AM
I think this season highlighted how dumb 3 tribes are. Erika got dragged to merge without going to tribal once. Wasn't in on many votes beyond being a number. That person shouldn't win other than through a bitter jury.

Deshaun wanted to throw a challenge just to boot her (terrible strategy in itself). Being a petulant child cost him the $1M. Not getting along with Shan in the "for the culture" alliance when you are just arguing about the boot order is egregiously bad play.

Xander had to claw his way to the merge, play from the bottom, win challenges and use an idol. I can respect that game even tho he wasn't voting people out.

No good storylines out of this season so I understand the heavy Shan edit. Her aggressive play was at least entertaining.

I wish I could quit watching this show but I'll see ya next season. Drop the 4 keep the 2.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 02:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmill
Your post last week about being convinced that Deshawn would win unanimously felt a bit like emotional hedging to me. I know you were very confident about Michelle winning last season as well, and I'm sure you were disappointed when she got blanked. IIRC after Tony won you didn't say anything about him playing well, just posted something about how men had won 6 times in a row and gotten almost all the jury votes during that run.

*Erika did get an odd edit for a winner, though I think that's partly because Shan dominated so much of the screen time early on.
After the last three Australian Survivor seasons having an extremely telegraphed winners edit, I watched s41 thinking Deshawn would win on nothing but his edit alone.

As I said above i'm very happy I was wrong as I can now go into season 42 knowing a player can be invisible in the whole pre merge and still win. I want to be surprised and not have the result spelt out for me like i'm a child.

At the time I was never particularly confident Michelle was going to win. I was confident very early on based on her episode 1-3 content she would make a very deep run and she did.

I thought Tony's edit was too OOT obvious to be a winners edit and actually had Sophie down as my winners pick based on the edit, but it turned out that it wasn't and the obvious edit got the win.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 03:03 AM
This season definitely gets the award for most FPS play by non thinking players. It's like amateur poker players watching a big bluff get pulled off on tv and then they don't understand why it didn't work when they tried it at the table.

It really was hard to root for someone this season. There were a few players that got voted out pre-merge that I think had a lot of potential for good gameplay, or at the very least good entertainment.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Down
This season definitely gets the award for most FPS play by non thinking players. It's like amateur poker players watching a big bluff get pulled off on tv and then they don't understand why it didn't work when they tried it at the table.

It really was hard to root for someone this season. There were a few players that got voted out pre-merge that I think had a lot of potential for good gameplay, or at the very least good entertainment.
Ye'p cant say I was rooting for or overly impressed by anyone's gameplay this season.

Enjoyed Sydney as a villain and Broccoli Brad as the wacky wild card but that's about it really
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 07:08 AM
I also think the fact it was a much shorter timeline contributed to the lack of ability to game play as we usually see. Those extra days, especially premerge create sometimes stronger bonds between players. And there were so many gimmicks and things going on the actual strategy of Survivor was watered down quite a bit. In less than two weeks they had merged and voted out six people. It's usually about another week together in a regular season.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by catangod
I think this season highlighted how dumb 3 tribes are. Erika got dragged to merge without going to tribal once. Wasn't in on many votes beyond being a number. That person shouldn't win other than through a bitter jury.

Deshaun wanted to throw a challenge just to boot her (terrible strategy in itself). Being a petulant child cost him the $1M. Not getting along with Shan in the "for the culture" alliance when you are just arguing about the boot order is egregiously bad play.

Xander had to claw his way to the merge, play from the bottom, win challenges and use an idol. I can respect that game even tho he wasn't voting people out.

No good storylines out of this season so I understand the heavy Shan edit. Her aggressive play was at least entertaining.

I wish I could quit watching this show but I'll see ya next season. Drop the 4 keep the 2.
Outside of this season, would you say that clawing yourself from the bottom is a good thing?

You say Xander clawed his way to the merge but there's actually zero evidence that Xander knew he was on the bottom. It just happened because he won the challenges, that's why he was willing to save Evvie at the first tribal council. Also the same applies to Erika. I'm just not sure why one is perceived as "being dragged" and the other is perceived as clawing his way to the merge and nobody here has made a strong distinction. My view, which I feel is more consistent is that Deshawn definitely played better than both of them for the first half of the game and threw it away by being an emotional mess.

Also both Erika and Xander won the same amount of challenges, Erika more if you count from the tribal level and she had more influence over the game. Still yet to see the argument folks.

I would say it was edited pretty badly, for contrast imagine how season 40 would have been edited if they only gave us info to root for the underdog - Michele. It's not like anyone here is making a coherent argument saying that she should've beaten Tony based on having to claw herself up to the top.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
12-17-2021 , 07:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symbioticse
Outside of this season, would you say that clawing yourself from the bottom is a good thing?

You say Xander clawed his way to the merge but there's actually zero evidence that Xander knew he was on the bottom. It just happened because he won the challenges, that's why he was willing to save Evvie at the first tribal council. Also the same applies to Erika. I'm just not sure why one is perceived as "being dragged" and the other is perceived as clawing his way to the merge and nobody here has made a strong distinction. My view, which I feel is more consistent is that Deshawn definitely played better than both of them for the first half of the game and threw it away by being an emotional mess.

Also both Erika and Xander won the same amount of challenges, Erika more if you count from the tribal level and she had more influence over the game. Still yet to see the argument folks.

I would say it was edited pretty badly, for contrast imagine how season 40 would have been edited if they only gave us info to root for the underdog - Michele. It's not like anyone here is making a coherent argument saying that she should've beaten Tony based on having to claw herself up to the top.
Ye'p totally agree about both Xander and Deshawn. I actually really enjoyed Xander as a character, the boy was an absolute quote machine, but he was a goat and I don't know how anyone can argue against it.

Deshawn's end game reminded me so much of Ian in Palau. I think he got to the emotional state where he may have forfeited fire for Danny or Liana if they were still live

I imagine Erikas winning game will end up being seen similarly to Danni Boatwright or Sophie Clarke. Dismissed by many in the short run due to being an underedited character but appreciated more in the long run.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD

      
m