Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight
Im not shrugging my shoulders and saying meh, I condone his actions. They are wrong. He clearly took advantage of someone in a vulnerable state. It is just not as you say it is. again.
I am just repeating what Kratz's victim told investigators.
I trust her version of events more than I do yours.
sod·om·y
ˈsädəmē/
noun
noun: sodomy
sexual intercourse involving anal or oral copulation.
Again, you are either stupid or lying. Maybe both.
Quote:
no restraining her so he can have sex with her,
"She said Kratz held her hands behind her back... Kratz also 'clamped her mouth shut to swallow' with his hands... [The victim] stated that Kratz was very strong."
Looks like you can't read, or like to lie. Maybe both.
Quote:
no threatening her if she didn't have sex with him,
"he [Kratz, the District Attorney] told her he knew everything about her, and if she did not listen to him he could 'get her jammed up.' "
That is a threat - what did he want her to do to avoid Kratz acting on his threat?
"he instructed her to give him a 'blow job,' and she did "
Why?
Because she was afraid of what Kratz would do, she was scared by his threat: "He can be a very intimidating man."
Again, all in the victim's statement which you left out, by mistake or on purpose.
Quote:
no multiple accusations from multiple women.
True, in this interview with one of Kratz's victims only one victim is interviewed.
Quote:
You have greatly exaggerated what has happened.
You are wrong, as anyone who comprehends English can see for themselves.
Quote:
Or rather, what she says happened.
You are a sad and sick little man.
Quote:
This is called "shifting the burden of proof" you are making a claim and asking me to prove you wrong.
Actually, since
you are claiming there are significant differences between what I wrote and the original, it is up to you to prove your claim.
Don't try any word games about 'logic' because you won't fool anyone.
I provided a link so readers could see I was accurate.
Quote:
How can I even do that without producing the whole testimony which is already linked itt?
This is what you are asking
me to do.
I say if you want it done, do it yourself.
Quote:
If these specific claims were made in her testimony youd have produced them by now. You produced quotes that summarized her testimony but not from the testimony directly that corroborates what you're saying.
I linked to the original so people could check to see if I was being accurate.
As I have shown, in
every instance I was correct and you were either wrong or telling a lie.
You don't do your cause any favors by engaging in a blatant cover up regarding the testimony of one of Kratz's victims.