Making a Murderer
03-09-2016
, 10:09 PM
No but srsly, you people have gone to doubleplus plaid plus double rainbow all up ITT.
so intense
I feel like I was linguistically crying wolf by calling you people idiots earlier. I'm not left with much after that except some Orwellian doubleplusidiot declarations.
Quote:
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
That you can't make this distinction is, while not wholly surprising, almost too perfectly thematic to be real.
so intense
I feel like I was linguistically crying wolf by calling you people idiots earlier. I'm not left with much after that except some Orwellian doubleplusidiot declarations.
03-09-2016
, 10:47 PM
Quote:
I didn't get that at all.
I think he couched his opinion based on "only what he had seen in the first two episodes" and further explains that because of the formula of a doc., he expected it to be that way - that the evidence would pile up against S.A. (so that the rest of the doc. could knock it down).
I believe he gives his thoughts and impressions contemporaneously with this viewing and when he states that the evidence against S.A. is "overwhelming" that it only so, if it is "legitimate." (or something to that effect).
From reading his posts, he seems to zero right in on Hillegas and adds to the many questions of Hillegas that we already identified in this thread.
I am very interested in what he says going forward as he will provide his conclusion based on the doc. and then he will do his own research and follow up.
I think he couched his opinion based on "only what he had seen in the first two episodes" and further explains that because of the formula of a doc., he expected it to be that way - that the evidence would pile up against S.A. (so that the rest of the doc. could knock it down).
I believe he gives his thoughts and impressions contemporaneously with this viewing and when he states that the evidence against S.A. is "overwhelming" that it only so, if it is "legitimate." (or something to that effect).
From reading his posts, he seems to zero right in on Hillegas and adds to the many questions of Hillegas that we already identified in this thread.
I am very interested in what he says going forward as he will provide his conclusion based on the doc. and then he will do his own research and follow up.
& see what happens going forward.
I admit the guy does put a lot into such a smallish & well worded piece, & am interested what he's saying about RH.
Apologies oski
03-09-2016
, 11:04 PM
03-09-2016
, 11:29 PM
Anyhow, I find his blog on the film fascinating because he gives a lot of good insight as to how he would pursue the case.
03-10-2016
, 01:33 PM
03-10-2016
, 08:10 PM
Quote:
no need to apologize.I had too Oski, I rushed to comment(Badly)when I had not watched it all.
I actually disagree with Moore on his Amanda Knox analysis - but I believe that had more to do with him working from bad information.
This.Prob why I did not continue with it. Gonna start 2nt.
Anyhow, I find his blog on the film fascinating because he gives a lot of good insight as to how he would pursue the case.
I actually disagree with Moore on his Amanda Knox analysis - but I believe that had more to do with him working from bad information.
This.Prob why I did not continue with it. Gonna start 2nt.
Anyhow, I find his blog on the film fascinating because he gives a lot of good insight as to how he would pursue the case.
Quote:
I just watched Gideons Army and would check that out too.
Cool Rich I will check this out over the weekend.I Ended up watching The Jinx as background noise lol but the last episode was pretty good that I had TO STAY TUNED.
I seen the rest apart from serial & because of the MaM threads i've been in Its ruined it for me.
Its funny Fraley keeps posting those same Doc's lol I wonder why lOl. Why not post those depositions Fraley from the Civil Case, even poorskillz shouted about them earlier but can't post them,I mean ffs guys.
Spoiler:
Posted from reddit, Thanks SkippTopp
Zellner's Latest Motions...
It's nothing earth-shattering, but in case you're curious about the status in filing the record with the appeals court, here is Zellner’s Motion to Correct the Record and Motion for Additional Time to Inspect the Record, filed March 8, 2016:
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...-2016Mar08.pdf
The aforementioned motions are the latest ones shown in the Court Record of Events.
Zellner is asking the Clerk of the Court to review the Compliation of Record (index of documents) and make corrections, as needed, to ensure it's complete and accurate. She's also asking for 21 days to review the record for prior to it being filed with the court of appeals; sounds like they have to do that review in person at the Manitowoc County Courthouse.
Not coincidentally, I too had some confusion about the documents labeled as "envelopes containing..." These are among the ones that were included in the most recent batch of documents, which were delayed because I initially thought they were sealed and not available for request. Turns out that was incorrect, save for the one that explicitly says "sealed".
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/keydocuments/
Last edited by smacc25; 03-10-2016 at 08:28 PM.
03-10-2016
, 09:23 PM
03-11-2016
, 05:23 PM
Quote:
I just watched Gideons Army and would check that out too.
This Doc need its own thread in politic's.
TY for the link Rich.
Spoiler:
Travis Williams, The True American Hero of the justice system. Indeed the 3 P.D were.