Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Notre Dame Football - A New Hope

05-05-2010 , 01:25 AM
It's dumb but not as bad as the complaining made it out to be.

I already torture myself with this dumber and more depressing clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyrRC...os=cNGUUmd40Jg
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-07-2010 , 05:13 PM
Any of the ND fans here worried that the conference realignment dominoes are about to fall into 4 Mega Conferences or whatever the ****, and ND will have to either: 1) relinquish it's cherished independence and join the conference dark side or 2) be left out of the whole mix altogether, which might be worse? I mean without being too cynical, it probably means saying goodbye to any National Championship aspirations if ND is stuck without a conference schedule + without a conference title playoff scenario to showcase the team late in the season.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-07-2010 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Any of the ND fans here worried that the conference realignment dominoes are about to fall into 4 Mega Conferences or whatever the ****, and ND will have to either: 1) relinquish it's cherished independence and join the conference dark side or 2) be left out of the whole mix altogether, which might be worse? I mean without being too cynical, it probably means saying goodbye to any National Championship aspirations if ND is stuck without a conference schedule + without a conference title playoff scenario to showcase the team late in the season.
Yes.

ND Admin will cave before 2) happens.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-07-2010 , 09:10 PM
I'll believe it when I see it. Going to a 4 Mega Conference model will be incredibly hard to do, just imagine the ensuing court battles and state legislation from the schools that are left behind. Maybe the Big 10 adds someone like Nebraska or Missouri, but a complete seismic shift is just sportswriters taking some remote possibility and running with it, imo.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-07-2010 , 09:24 PM
Big 12 and Big East are as good as dead.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-08-2010 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
I'll believe it when I see it. Going to a 4 Mega Conference model will be incredibly hard to do, just imagine the ensuing court battles and state legislation from the schools that are left behind. Maybe the Big 10 adds someone like Nebraska or Missouri, but a complete seismic shift is just sportswriters taking some remote possibility and running with it, imo.
I'm sort of in your camp, but people who cover college football seriously who I don't consider idiot hysterical writers like Dr Saturday sound a lot like Heater's post below yours: that the seismic shift is more likely to happen than not at this point.

I really can't believe how much the Big Ten Network changed the landscape of college football in like, what, 2 years? I remember when it came out I thought it would be a huge jopke that like 150 people in the country like us (hardcore college sports fans) would fap to and no one else would watch. Like terrible poor man's versions of CSTV and ESPNU since the coverage would be regional. Instead it's such a cash cow the Big Ten is pretty much is destroying the status quo by trying to increase the footprint of the network AND they have plenty of willing schools looking to take the bait. And all the other conferences are forming TV networks and looking for schools to become partners (ie, the pac10 and their attempts to wrangle Texas and the rest of the Plains states/mountain west schools)

Last edited by DVaut1; 06-08-2010 at 10:12 AM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-08-2010 , 04:52 PM
The BTN was a marketing genious. People aren't tuning in in droves for Minnesota vs Purdue. Whoever negotiated it onto the higher cable tier so everyone paying for it is one of the best negotiators there is.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-09-2010 , 10:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadMoneyWalking
The BTN was a marketing genious. People aren't tuning in in droves for Minnesota vs Purdue. Whoever negotiated it onto the higher cable tier so everyone paying for it is one of the best negotiators there is.
It's not there for most people.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-09-2010 , 10:49 AM
The funny thing about this whole expansion thing is that I believe it was all just a ploy to get ND to join the Big10. It could have happened the easy way (saying yes and stopping at 12 teams) or the hard way (saying no and completely destroying 2 conferences and revamping the whole landscape of college football).

It must suck to be the Big East or Big12. Delaney is ruthless. But this is awesome if you are a proponent of the playoff system. It seems inevitable. This is why ND must join a conference now. It appears Delaney was 3 steps ahead of all his competition the whole time.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-09-2010 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
It's not there for most people.
What about in the midwest region?
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-09-2010 , 05:13 PM
mgoblog has a post up today about how much the BTN is worth to the teams in the Big Ten: almost $20 mil per team per year. Link here.

This does not count the money the Big Ten gets from it's separate deal with ABC/ESPN, which is supposed to be in line with what the SEC gets.

By way of comparison, the SEC is locked into an ESPN contract worth 12.5 million per team per year for 15 years.

Big Ten Network revenues will grow yearly.

Also by way of comparison and per this, NBC will pay ND $9 mil this year:

Quote:
The current contract that expires in 2010 is reported to be worth $9 million a year.
Delaney is a brilliant imo.

Also if these numbers are true, you can see why realignment is inevitable. Even if the Big Ten just tinkers and snaps up Nebraska and the BigXII grabs another school to replace them and that's the only change this offseason -- if/when the PAC10 gets a network too and tries to expand by taking all the FBS programs in Texas, **** will hit the fan again.

I don't see how ND can stay independent in this climate. Either the conferences will all create money-printing TV networks that dwarf the dollars ND can get from NBC, eventually putting them at a huge and unique competitive disadvantage much worse than their academic standards, or the college football explodes into the mega-conference model to make their networks more appealing to cable/sat providers. ND either joins up with a conference or the program withers away trying to stay nationally relevant just playing Army and Navy and never having a conf. championship and showcasing themselves in conference postseason tournaments where that kind of stuff will be even more valuable than it is now.

Last edited by DVaut1; 06-09-2010 at 05:23 PM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 12:59 AM
I don't think your numbers are correct. The article you linked says that according to Illinois, they're getting a total of 14.9 million from all television sources, ESPN and the BTN included. That's a far cry from 20 million plus ESPN money, I have zero idea where you got that. More recent articles have put the ND NBC deal at around 15 million per year, plus then you throw a couple million more on top for the Big East basketball money, and suddenly things aren't so clear cut. Then when you factor in the fact that any expansion of the Big Ten would most likely be cutting the pie 16 ways, it's even more questionable whether or not there are actually big bags of money at the end of the conference rainbow.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 01:17 AM
yeah dv, it's 20m per team, not just for the btn
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
I don't think your numbers are correct. The article you linked says that according to Illinois, they're getting a total of 14.9 million from all television sources, ESPN and the BTN included. That's a far cry from 20 million plus ESPN money, I have zero idea where you got that.
Mea culpa

They're getting 15 mil from all TV sources combined:



Even granting ND gets say 17-20 mil from TV (I suspect the $15 mil is right because NBC reupped ND through 2015 and they're probably getting a few mil from the Big East hoops pie plus NCAA tournament revenue etc), that gets ND essentially (and just for the moment) ~15-25% more than schools like Indiana and Northwestern in terms of TV money. And BTN revenues project to grow and ND is locked into NBC for another 5 seasons. More on growth:

Quote:
Then when you factor in the fact that any expansion of the Big Ten would most likely be cutting the pie 16 ways, it's even more questionable whether or not there are actually big bags of money at the end of the conference rainbow.
Right, but:

Quote:
The BTN has 17.6 million subscribers inside the eight-state conference "footprint'' (geographical area) and 27.5 million outside. Those numbers are important because the network receives 88 cents per subscriber per month inside its footprint and 5 cents outside
Increasing the size of the conference = increases the footprint = increases the pie, so yes, if they took on 5 more teams, they'd divide it 16 ways instead of 11, but ostensibly, those 5 teams would increase the footprint by a lot and the revenue pie would be that much larger to split.

Last edited by DVaut1; 06-10-2010 at 11:03 AM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 10:53 AM
Re: Growth.

http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/20...g-ten-network/

Quote:
I did my level best to average numbers, to play it conservatively, to be fair across the board with finding any schools potential. Notre Dame and Pittsburgh are a little tough to gauge because they don’t add any new television markets. But I found that by extrapolating what is already happening with the conference and the Big Ten Network, combining that with my television experiences, and taking into account some of the posters comments and thoughts I came away with what I feel is a pretty fair assessment of the potential of the candidates. As many of you have noted, game attendance and athletic revenue are important. I used attendance to gauge the level of support and fan interest to help me put a dollar value on ratings potential. If the fans won’t even fill their own stadium, how valuable is the team overall? Any team that joins the Big Ten will share in the Big Ten pie, so I subtracted off the current tv pay out for those teams to gauge strength in their home markets. Then extrapolated to find a decent estimation of a new tv markets potential for advertising revenue. I also averaged in the carry rates for the home market or markets with the number of cable subscribers. I did add a category to try to account for additional Live programming on the BTN and gave each school a flat $10,000,000 for the additional sports coverage, that is probably too low but I am leaning to the conservative side. The following is a summary of the totals of my findings.
CANDIDATES TOTAL ADDED REVENUE ESTIMATE

Texas $101,369,004
Rutgers WITH NYC $67,798,609
Nebraska $54,487,990
Maryland $50,818,889
Boston College $48,382,692
Notre Dame $47,629,255
Kansas $46,320,092
Missouri $45,901,459
Syracuse $43,504,813
Connecticut $38,080,271
Pittsburgh $34,365,175
Iowa State $31,831,077

Syracuse WITH NYC $65,874,573
Quote:
Looks like adding Nebraska will (again, just a guess) add another ~55 mil to the revenue pie, so dividing the old number+$55mil by 12 instead of 11, it's worth another another ~$3-$4 mil to each school.

Last edited by DVaut1; 06-10-2010 at 10:58 AM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:00 AM
I don't think I can take a model seriously that thinks that BC is worth more than ND.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
I don't think I can take a model seriously that thinks that BC is worth more than ND.
The model explains why... it brings in a new (and pretty large) market. Notre Dame doesn't do that at all. It brings in more viewers, but it comes with a lot of overlap. Bringing in an entirely new market is huge for revenue.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
I don't think I can take a model seriously that thinks that BC is worth more than ND.
BC brings Boston. Notice on the chart that the cable increase for BC is $15mil while it's $0 for ND. From the link:

Quote:
Notre Dame and Pittsburgh are a little tough to gauge because they don’t add any new television markets.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:11 AM
Well, if the model says so, it must be right!
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:15 AM
Care to offer an argument then? At least the model explains itself.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:16 AM
dudd -- there is this explanation that makes sense. It's not just "this model exists, therefore it's right". It's "there's this explanation that makes sense". Frankthetank is a good blogger and has been on top of this from the start.

BTN in Boston area = more and new money. BTN is already in Chicago/Indiana basic cable tiers so...no new money. ND's wide appeal is captured in the "Est. Increase In the Current Footprint" column; it's going to increase ad revenue for sure because ND has a rabid fan base. No one is discounting "ND is worth more than BC" in important ways but given the current geographical reality of the BTN, BC is worth more (I mean they're basically equal) because it gets the BTN on basic cable in the northeast and carriage fees are a big part of the revenue pie. The situation would be drastically different if we were talking about a fictional SEC network that was on basic cable in the south but on the upper digital tiers everywhere else, and they were deciding between ND and BC for an expansion partner. Of course ND would be worth a lot more than BC then.

But that's not the case here.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:17 AM
BC is not going to deliver the Boston market because no one gives two ****s about BC football in Boston. Sometimes a little common sense goes a long ways.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:36 AM
I'm pretty sure they don't have to deliver anything. They just have to be in Boston. If BC is in Boston, then the Big10 Network gets $.88 per subscriber as opposed to $.05 for all Boston area (maybe all Massachusetts) subscribers. That is why all this talk about Rutgers makes sense but is very confusing. Sure no on in NYC cares about Rutgers football. But if the Big10 Network can command $.88 per cable subscriber in NYC since it is in the same state and therefore in the footprint, then $$$$$$$$$. Delaney is a genius.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 11:42 AM
The key flaw is assuming that the BTN would instantly be snapped up by cable companies just because there is a local team. BC is basically a slightly better version of Northwestern. They drew 33k and 25k to their first two home games this year ffs, and weren't even able to sell out their 44k seat stadium in conference play. There is a zero percent chance that whoever the Boston cable company is will just hand over a couple million dollars a month for a cable channel that hardly anyone in the Boston market will even know exists. The same goes for teams like Syracuse and Rutgers, there is no guarantee that the BTN will suddenly be on basic cable in the NYC market if you add those teams. As the saying goes, garbage in, garbage out.

Last edited by Dudd; 06-10-2010 at 11:58 AM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
06-10-2010 , 12:18 PM
BTN won't allow teams in the footprint on non-basic cable (ie, digital/upper tiers), so in the hypothetical scenario where BC joins the Big Ten but cable carriers refuse to put BTN on basic cable results in their subscribers not getting to see Boston College football at all.

As with happened with cable carriers all over the midwest back in 2007, including those that serve markets where people don't really care that much about the college football teams (places like Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana), the cable carriers put up a valiant fight but pretty much every single one gave up once the first football game hit the air and customers were bolting to satellite TV to get the BTN, and the BTN is now uniformly on basic cable all across the midwest.

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/...internal-faith

Quote:
Is Rutgers capable of bringing in the New York market? Could a combination of Rutgers, Syracuse and Connecticut corner New York, and bring in a sliver of Boston, too? Why isn't the Big Ten pursuing Boston College as well?

These questions are constantly popping up as the Big Ten continues its expansion study. But it's important to mention an element that seems to get overlooked.

The Big Ten might be able to succeed in any market because of the strength it already possesses.

In other words, who cares if Rutgers can bring in New York? The Big Ten can bring in New York by itself; Rutgers simply gives the league a reason to be more present in the market. You'd have Ohio State, Michigan and Penn State making regular trips to Piscataway, N.J. You'd have a reason to try to get the Big Ten Network on local cable providers in the New York area, which could be very lucrative for the entire league.

Rutgers or Syracuse or Connecticut or even Boston College are simply ways to get in the door. Sure, they would have to bring something to the table. Big Ten presidents aren't going to share their money with just anyone.

But if the Big Ten is confident enough in its existing product -- its teams, its network, its clout in college sports -- it might not care too much about how much the new additions really pull into the league. And all indications suggest the confidence is there, from Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany to the university presidents and on down the list.

David Jones summarizes it perfectly:

"The reason the Big Ten is now such a cash cow and so attractive is cable rights fees pouring in from [Jim] Delany's 2-year-old Big Ten Network -- to the tune of $66 million last fiscal year. The Big Ten is hardly interested in the game-to-game ratings Rutgers or Syracuse would bring -- which, by the way, are historically comparable to several Big Ten schools. It's the new cable footprint and prospect of a deal with NYC metro provider Cablevision, one similar to the pact arduously hacked out by the BTN with Time-Warner in the Midwest and Comcast in Pennsylvania. That's where the big money is these days in TV sports."
BTN literally pwned pretty much every single cable carrier in the midwest, including in places where college football ratings are historically comparable to lesser Big Ten schools. BC bloggers admit their games aren't well-attended but the TV ratings for their games are very good.

Quote:
BC fans are constantly reminded about our travel woes, but no one ever mentions our great TV ratings. We consistently break ratings records in our bowl games. When we were on the Raycom/Jefferson-Pilot package in 2005 the ACC syndicator had its best season ever (things were so good that ESPN hasn't allowed us to slip down to the JP game since). Further documentation:

Boston College's 14-10 win at Virginia Tech on Oct. 25 was the highest-rated Thursday night game ever on ESPN.

And that game went head to head with a Red Sox World Series game.
Quote:
BC gets great TV ratings
Quote:
BC has now produced the highest TV ratings ever for each of the last three bowl games in which it's played:

2007 Champs Sports Bowl - 3.69 rating, 3.6M households; 2006 Meineke Car Care - 3.87 rating, 3.56M households; 2005 MPC Computers Bowl - 2.33 rating; all still the best-ever ratings for those bowls.
A little knowledge of the world of college football beyond South Bend goes a long way.

Last edited by DVaut1; 06-10-2010 at 12:34 PM.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote

      
m