yep, just see all of the threads he starts, he wants people think he is funny.

He was saying that they are held to different minimums. It can be read in a way that implies that he slightly misread in a superficial way, which is why I threw in clarification. But it seems like he got it. You, on the other hand, have no idea wtf that paragraph means, or you wouldn't be talking about the minimum requirements of some religious accreditation group as if they were the equivalent of the state regulations.

You lied.

Does dicknightx ever post anything useful? Seems like all I ever see quoted from him is "Waaaaaaaaa.... stop responding to Joey! Look at me! Waaaaaaaaaaa"

He just trolls you because you are ridiculous. He was one of the better posters around before you showed up.

Which one of his accounts?

And I think that may have been one of the nicest things anyone has ever said to me.
Thanks!

He's one of the very few people I have on ignore. even without reading his actual posts (unless they're quoted) I can attest that every thread he posts in eventually leads to someone getting exacerbated with his posting. Every thread he's in deteriorates into a conversation about how dense he is being.

That being said, I can say the same thing about Splendour. But splendour, while frustrating, is still interesting because of her unique worldview. JD just seems like a drunk frat boy trying to get a reaction.

Actually...I'm a fat 40 year old wearing small cowboy chaps.

Oh wait...that's you.


Oh snap!

its ****ing annoying. i had him on ignore for a while, i might go back to that. i dont think ive read a single post of his that added something to the conversation.

Unlike this great addition to the thread.

I am begging you ...please put me on ignore.

Why did you have to go there?

My dad has nothing to do with this.... so stop it.
Let us just soak up the goodness in this photo:

Joey,

you suck at reading comprehension. like, really bad.

Just because you don't get things....doesn't mean i have bad reading comprehension.

That's correct. However, you do have pretty bad reading comprehension.

Yea....maybe.

riiiiight....we all have trouble understanding things from time to time. i don't think there's anything in this thread that I don't "get", but that's not the point either way.

when clearly shown to be wrong, all you ever do is attack some other minor point regarding either your post the person is replying to, or their response to that post. you won't continue that line of discussion because even you know you've been proven dead wrong and you know it would be pathetic to go on at that point. but, heaven forbid you acknowledge that perhaps you spoke too soon without looking into the matter.

it's nothing new. every reg theist on here does the same thing, but most don't go about it in such a crude manner.

that said, clearly people still have interest enough to reply to your posts. i feel like for the most part Splendour is ignored much much more than she was like two years ago.

you might as well ride it out as long as you can. rather than, i don't know, becoming more honest about what you're saying and what you're reading.

Angry/unhappy atheist count just went up by 1...congrats.

Splendour et al actually try to debate, so it's more of a spectacle. Joey will just occasionally throw in a comment and then retreat because he knows he isn't capable of holding conversations here unless they involve less serious topics.

.