Sommerset,

thanks for the heads up
fricken eh. I don't know why this thread really got under my skin....

That's fine. But do it without plagiarizing other people's work.

it's okay, I will make up for it by not going to weekly church

classic lol

I'd feel evil even arguing against nooberftw, I think he may legitimately either be a teenager, or mentally ill.

I dont see anything as to WHY they are doing this. I couldnt watch the whole video, but from what I could see, it was just about nwo and stuff. This in no way says why demons do what they do.

there is soft dinosaur tissue still living!
its real and nobody is denying that its real

Why would you need anything else?

The bible is a fact because its the evidence is just overwhelming, there isnt one prophecy that hasnt been or isnt going to be fulfilled, the earth is young, the nephilim remains are real

Just today in the news
algae isnt red
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...our-blood.html

Revelation 16:3
The second angel poured out his bowl into the sea, and it became like the blood of a corpse, and every living thing died that was in the sea

2012 Something Is Going On!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk-3MU-rc0M

The graph wasnt produced by the WHO it claims to have been prepared from data from the WHO. Did you type in the link they posted as a citation? It doesnt lead anywhere.

I've read two WHO reports on fluoride. They concluded that fluoridation at low levels produces health benefits.

I know you dont need a study - you're happy to accept the claims of the fluoride conspiracy nutjobs without critique. Sensible people (or policy makers) do though.
I agree. This has nothing to do with whether it is beneficial or not.
That's also true and equally irrelevant.
This isnt true, but is irrelevant.
There's arsenic in fruit juice. *gasp*
It can be kept below a certain concentration, as recommended by the WHO and other studies.
If you swallow water, does it come in contact with your teeth?
Programs with health benefits arent free, but that's not a reason to not implement them.
This is surprising, if true. On balance it's probably false.
The consequent doesnt follow from the antecedent (which based on past experience is probably false anyhow - unless by "study" they mean "webpage produced by FAN and friends").
Your strongest point so far.
They're also poorer. Clearly fluoride will make everyone rich!
Just outright false.
Tea and coffee are radioactive.
You can dump tapwater in the sea.
What evidence do you have that trace amounts of fluoride cause brain damage and cancer? As above - assertions dont count.

i suggest to read the bible

Theyre just evil beings and they wanted to rebel against god and they want to get everyone to rebel against god because they want to make a new world order

you will go to hell if you follow them.

Revelation 14:9-12
9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,

10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

About 4,300,000 hits, has to be something to it.

but theres dinosaur soft tis-

never mind

There are around 10,000 species of dinosaur still alive, so plenty of soft tissue.

T-rex?

No more

How about?

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scienc.../dinosaur.html

but it really cant survive tens of millions of years

they do that in literally every article

"there goes those crazy old conspiracy theorists again!"

If the shoe fits...

That is an assumption which you want to be true because it favors your preferred conclusion of a young earth.

There is no doubt the bones are over 6000 years old. That leaves two possible conclusions. First is that this is not actual soft tissue (no no big deal). Second, it means soft tissue could be preserved for much longer that we expected it could (paradigm shifting OMFG Hotcakes). Either way, science will not say what must be, and thereby formulate a scenario. It will (as it always has) evaluate what is and develop and explanation through empirical process, subject to severe scrutiny and revision pending additional empirical evidence.

waiiiiiiiiiit a minute
you accuse me of doing this
"That is an assumption which you want to be true because it favors your preferred conclusion of a young earth. "

but then you say
"it means soft tissue could be preserved for much longer that we expected it could"

you see where im going

big words like this convince a lot of people and they like it because they can just shift the burden over to some collective

but this objective scrutiny doesnt really happen

they are going to teach whatever they want in schools even if its all blatant lies , see: dr hovind video

You're right. Creationists not understanding the meaning of 'empirical' is a major source of the problem. They don't understand (or won't understand) the scientific method, so they shift the burden over to some collective to do their thinking for them. Polly want a cracker?

I'm sure this happens with a lot of people, but you won't find many of them around here. IME, most of the regular posters ITF are of the 'proof or GTFO' mindset, and you had better do your research and understand what's going on before you spout nonsense.

The outright lies of creationists have been refuted over and over and over again. At this point, it would be refreshing for them to actually come up with a new idea, as that would at least let the community at large know they're capable of original thought.

I enjoy reading opinions from ******o creationists like yourself.

Hi, I'm a first year Geologist.

And you are wrong.

thats why i posted the websites
theres articles every day

the only idea that evolution has got is carbon dating which it doesnt even have

go on