Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay Poker
Serious question- how can one truly prove poker collusion beyond a shadow of a doubt? Couldn't any soft play just be defended as an honest mistake? Seems almost impossible to truly "prove" unless you're a mind reader, beyond blatantly making signals or passing cards to each other
It is nearly impossible unless other players suffer a measurable material loss (of time or money) due to the actions/ misactions of two or more players working in tandem or a combination of employees/players working together. Also, TD gets ultimate say in whether act of collusion has occurred. If WSOP likes Tim, it'll be difficult to have sanctions handed down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk