Quote:
Originally Posted by BingoBango
There are countries that still have glued in photos and people are still allowed to fly on them ffs.
Well, if you live in one of those countries or traveling to those countries, then you don't need to think about it. When I was traveling a bunch of African countries last year they don't care and just stamp you in with their visas that looks like they were made by a toy stamp set.
But if you are traveling around US/EU, then you shouldn't dismiss this. It can bite you in the ass. The problem with the chip passports is that the chip is probably(?) much easier to damage and will not scan.
Anyway, I travel on EU passport with no chip and my passport is a bit more beat up that the one in the video. My pre-9/11 passport looked way worse. But back then, immigration used to be so much more relaxed. These days, I'm getting increasingly more holds and questions. I've had several instances where I was pulled aside for 15 minutes as they took my passport to the back for examination. This was at NY, DC, London (and I think at Miami or Madrid, don't remember which one anymore). And like I said, my passport doesn't look that bad at all.
I've also gotten extra examination because my India visa entry/exit dates were smudged just a little bit even though it was obvious I was still within visa date constraints. This was in Delhi. I can only imagine what would happen if one of the two dates was unrecognizably smudged.
None of my minor incidents got me stranded anywhere and they were just small delays. But they still cause stress, and are an indicator of things to come. During each incident, I couldn've just come across some guy having a bad day that decides to hold me a few more hours, making me miss my flight, or similar.
Anyway, I don't think you should be so dismissive. The downside is huge for many travelers. Maybe backpackers with no agenda and no time constraints don't care, but virtually everyone else would care.