View: If stealthmunk doesn't open limp 33 he wins the main event - Page 2 - High Stakes MTT Strategy

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Strategy High Stakes MTT

View: If stealthmunk doesn't open limp 33 he wins the main event

...

Page 2 of 2

1 2

Page 2 of 2

1 2

11-06-2015 , 12:14 AM

#26

rooooktaker

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 280

Quote:

Originally Posted by squire1888

telling some one to fix there teeth on a public forum is not life advice its taking a cheap shot at someone no matter how you brush it off imo unless from a friend as a joke even then still ****ty

was hoping the monk FTd it just to annoy dnegs cos hes the worlds biggest thunder****

+1, and im being a 100% serious

geez, u have lost it man

11-06-2015 , 12:19 AM

#27

ebet33

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 4,994

Prty sure his thought process w qq was " *** me I rly don't wanna run into a better hand atm let's just fold and ladder"

11-06-2015 , 03:39 AM

#28

betterlol

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 248

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knumhealts

I wasn't trying to hurt you. I was giving you life advice. You were so kind to help me out, so I Figured I'd return the favor. I am being 100% serious.

People nowadays are usually being too polite and/or just don't care.

I personally find it refreshing when two strangers can exchange advice in such a direct and heartfelt manner.

Again, good luck. And I am being 100% serious.

11-06-2015 , 12:51 PM

#29

ebet33

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 4,994

Quote:

Originally Posted by squire1888

Needs love

11-06-2015 , 01:59 PM

#30

AALegend

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 2,174

Quote:

Originally Posted by bikram

i thought his sizing was bad but the dude crushes.

I think the idea of making it 2.5BB rather than a more standard 3-3.2BB after a limper was to widen stealthmunk's limp-shoving range. Stealthmunk admitted himself earlier in the thread that he thought about limp-shoving, because of the sizing when it got back to him and if sm had 66-88/AJ type of hand rather than 33, he most likely would have shoved.

11-06-2015 , 09:29 PM

#31

Soepgroente

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 4,083

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knumhealts

What he 'perceived' is results oriented nonsense is just what I'm saying. There were huge pay jumps. Joe was godmoding. People were playing scared.

He said he was more scared of Joe than me because he saw Joe's 66 face up. Anything he says is after the fact bs. He made a good fold.

I'm going to look super strong putting any money in the pot after Joe flats in this spot. I think shoving is going to be better than any variation of calling as if I overcall, I think Joe will play relatively perfect vs me from the turn on in this hand, whereas if he has the NFD its extremely likely he gets it in with me now.

Also, clearly didn't expect turyansky to fold QQ. Joe's godmoding and extreme pay jumps made the spot so ****ed.

If this hand took place at the FT, Alex would call every time. I wasn't saying he sucked. I was saying its completely absurd any analysis he said after the fact seeing the cards complete bull****.

Yeah I agree with this. You can't flat, too many turns that kill action and it polarises you to traps and hands that are too weak to raise. The only consideration is whether you want to make it 2.2-2.6M or go all in, I guess I'd prefer the first this deep in the main but it's not a huge difference.

I do think it's pretty easy to put you on a big draw or set though, not much else makes sense. You're not gonna ship the flop with 88 or 87dd imo and you don't make much money vs A4dd and probably a losing call if the player behind you wakes up with a set sometimes.

11-06-2015 , 09:51 PM

#32

Soepgroente

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 4,083

Also, I really don't like removing/editing posts or banning or any mod action. I'm totally cool with trashtalking or friendly jabs, but this unconstructive nonsense against someone who has clearly struggled with legitimate issues is really, really low.

11-07-2015 , 02:58 AM

#33

betterlol

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 248

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soepgroente

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/87...-munk-1302950/

I have always felt for the guy and I wouldn't write anything against him. Obviously I didn't sugar-coat my words enough but that doesn't change my intention.

11-07-2015 , 07:12 PM

#34

Setup_exe

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 357

glad he didnt raise then...

11-08-2015 , 02:01 AM

#35

ihavethewheel

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 216

Betterlol, Scumbag move to attack someone's looks that they may actually have no control over.i thought He was wrong when attempting to induce action in the hand he wasn't involved in (should've gotten a penalty) and I definitely thought it was childish with the "I don't shake hands" comment. People should be able to voice their opinion on something relevant to the tournament, but not by attacking the way a person looks. Grow up dude.