3bettor is an aggro reg (swedish too fyi) and def capable of squeezing light here etc. What do you guys think of my play here? Also what can ryanbluf call us with?


Full Tilt Poker $33,000 Guarantee (1r+1a) No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t20/t40 Blinds - 6 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

Hero (MP): t2995 M = 49.92
Mattssons (CO): t3985 M = 66.42
Mario_Basler (BTN): t3990 M = 66.50
bigdogpckt5s (SB): t3865 M = 64.42
Akaperion (BB): t4695 M = 78.25
ryanbluf (UTG): t3880 M = 64.67

Pre Flop: (t60) Hero is MP with 6 6
ryanbluf raises to t120, Hero calls t120, Mattssons raises to t360, 3 folds, ryanbluf calls t240, Hero calls t240

Flop: (t1140) T Q A (3 players)
ryanbluf checks, Hero checks, Mattssons checks

Turn: (t1140) 5 (3 players)
ryanbluf checks, Hero checks, Mattssons checks

River: (t1140) 3 (3 players)
ryanbluf bets t390, Hero requests TIME, Hero raises to t2635 all in

So you're repping exactly 33?

EDIT: And Ryan can call with pretty much his whole range since you're repping 1 hand.

Why can I not check my whole range twice on this board?

Your range of hands you can value shove the river with? Seriously?

Which hands do you play like this that are actually good given action and runout?

His whole range, apparently?

Agree with the MVP of the WSOP.

KJ, TT, AQ, AT, 66, 33?

????

It's seeming more and more likely this is one of your "Let me post a HH with a different hand than I actually had and have a pointless theory discussion" threads.

Uhh no dfish, quit bein such a dick about everything i post too plz.

Regardless of whether you would check {KJ, TT, AQ, AT} on the turn (and you really shouldn't IMO), the only thing that matters here is whether Ryan will think that you would or could, and he won't, because very few people would in a multiway 3bet pot.

ok so, how often do you play each of those hands this way:

x% KJ
x% TT
x% AQ
x% 55 (you meant 55 right?)
x% 33

Also how often do you think villains expect you to play those hands this way?

its absurd that you would do this with 66 and not like 77 or 88

lol obv meant 55. why would it be bad to check all these hands twice? I think it would look extremely strong to be betting any of these on turn. (In hind sight I prob should have bet 66 on the turn because of this). Fwiw they both snap folded but that obv doesn't make my play good because I still can't decide if I like it or not.

lol, the only thing that could be viewed that way is what I said about the possibility of this hand not existing, I've never said anything else that would qualify as "bein a dick", and I guess I apologize for thinking this hand/the fact that you'd check the turn with any nut hand, was a lil silly.

i can't see you ever taking this line w/ these hands, other than 33, so you're 100% wrong. unless you are admitting you would play these hands this way which has to be bad.

on that board on the turn each of those hands, other than 33, are pretty easy bets. you'd have 2.5k-ish w/ 1.1k-ish in pot, i can't see wtf you would be checking on the turn for. with every one of those hands in your range you posted, you'd bet the turn for value to get more in the pot to shove riv for value. otherwise, it's much harder to get paid off fully. so why are you thinking that a smart, thinking player will suddenly give you credit for those hands with your line? not to mention the flush draw and obv broadway cards that can come on riv and prevent you from getting more in the pot.

sketchy tha boss

you are repping 33..
390 into 1140 obv weak so ryanbluf will obv outlevel you and call