Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagles
I sorta aree with you though tbh in cash vs tough players especially if im in the SB and the BB squeezes a lot I'll fold small pairs for 100bbs here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock3656
I think folding preflop is tottally optimal vs the best player at the table, I hate set mining out o position against players that play well postflop and are good hand readers. Agame please explain to me why folding pre is terrible?
Why does everybody assume that because you have 100+ bb's in a tourney it can be equally compared to having 100+ bb's in a cash game. Doubling up early in an mtt and crippling/knocking out possibly the only threat at your starting table is soooooooooooooooooooooooo much more valuable than doubling up at a cash table.
Not to mention the differences in just how the play in a hand will differ greatly from cash games to tournaments. While Waco will c-bet a ton on flops, he probably won't fire too many 2nd barrels with air if you do happen to show some resistance. I'm sure early he's going to want to preserve his stack for trying to bust donkeys and not for firing multiple times with air into competent players. I mean 55 isn't exactly 22, you can continue on some flops without making a set. You could even donk the flop or c/c flop and donk the turn and pick it up sometimes due to waco lethargy.
And eagles, folding small pp's in the sb and the bb are very different. I don't think early deepstacked in an mtt I would fold one in either position, because I don't expect random players in the bb to squeeze often at all early in a donkument. But, it's at least a little more acceptable. In the bb you complete the action and are guaranteed to see a cheap flop.