I've had some history with villain and I believe (an saw a while back at a final table with him) that he is very fancy and capable of making plays, especially in position. He could very have 5 high in those spot some small % of the time after flatting pre w/54s to take it away postflop.

Hes a reg that's been around for a long time I believe.

No Limit Holdem Tournament
PokerStars
8 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
$150+$12

Stacks:
UTG n1stunna77 (43k)
UTG+1 Kifaraa (26k)
MP1 Drewfus81 (70k)
MP2 PURPLE"K"99 (64k)
CO FaceStealer (62k)
BTN runslikerubs (122k)
SB Hero (87k)
BB SuperUsed (38k)

Blinds: 1k/2k Ante 250

Pre-Flop: (5k, 8 players) Hero is SB Q 8
3 folds, PURPLE"K"99 raises to 4k, 2 folds, Hero raises to 11k, 1 fold, PURPLE"K"99 calls 7.3k

Flop: A 8 A (27k, 2 players)
Hero bets 10.0k, PURPLE"K"99 calls 10.0k

Turn: A (47k, 2 players)
Hero (65703)?

I believe he would definitely 4bet jamm all pairs besides QQ+, he might flat those. AT+ and QK he would probably 4bet jamm as well expecting me to have a 3b/folding range there.

My table image is very agressive but he has just moved to our table 1 or 2 orbits ago.

What about flop en what about turn? What do we do? x/c x/f or shove?

in bfore, why 3bet Q8s there vs that type of player.

doubt he bluffs much now, just b/f

we have 1 PSB left.......

my bad

I guess don't 3b then

Against purpk pre here looks rly rly bad
Awful spot to make a small 3 bet and oop and against a guy who flats in position and with a mediocre play hand
As played just shove

bet, or c/c

check flop, as played c/f

wtf no way checking flop is good unless u plan on calling all 3 st

As i said in my first reply, the 3bet was bad.. But so we did that and got there on the flop..

Why shove turn instead of x/c'ing and letting him bluff his floats on the flop (which he is def. capable off). Why do you think shoving is better then x/c'ing?

check/getting it in > jamming and probably what i prefer since like you said, 99-QQ (maybe 99+) gets it in pre