Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
jamjams confirmed flapping in the breeze
dude is mowing lawns on Neptune right now amirite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulman
On "agreeing": DF II stated that the split is pretty entirely for the sake of compliance, so the optimal choice is whatever leads to the best compliance. The 10% magic of carb cycling can probably safely be discounted.
speaking of reading comprehension, DF actually stated 80% compliance/10% training boost from extra cals (which you seem to be ignoring entirely)/10% #magicmetabolicwindow. those might even be conservative numbers for the latter two; imo they could each be as high as 15%. so, nah, handwaving the compound effects of the calorie and nutrient splits away just because you can't hack it isn't particularly convincing. lol btw that you'd require "a less drastic split"; it's -10/+20 ffs, just about as tame as you can get while still being outside reasonable margins of calorie-counting error.
i mean think about it quantitatively: if you'd been taking advantage of that extra 10-15% (or 20-30%) boost, today your 1RM deadlift could be as brolific as 290 pounds.
Quote:
I think Euro's just being stupid and not trolling, but dude is admittedly a tad annoying. Like the annoying little nephew at family gatherings, or maybe your aunt's little poodle.
lolz wrong again.
What makes you say that, though? because I'm advocating trying to find an extra training edge that you're dismissing due to your
vast experience? because I (half-jokingly, half-srsly) suggested that Monte listen to somebody who is, you know, actually strong?
back in the H&F stone age you acted like your **** didn't stink when you parroted advice from the gospel according to Mark. what qualifies you, now, to determine what should and should not be discounted?