But buuuut,
Maybe my adductor mobility is elite then.
Wider stance and greater foot angle is way more comfortable to me and allow more upright back and shins posture.
If a person has long femurs and short torso, squatting w/ narrow stance requires quite a bit of ankle mobility and the back angle will be such that it puts low back in a greater risk wrt rounding.
To illustrate the difference, here is some CAD-drawings I just drew:
Comparison of narrow and wide stances:
With wider stance loco and I are making the effective length of our femurs more tolerable.
Imo.
Hence my confusion with you suggesting loco to narrow his stance.
ETA:
Note:
Enlargened the head quite a bit from what I initially drew, to keep the drawing realistic.
A big head is required to accommodate all the head fat.
Last edited by Pummi81; 04-29-2014 at 03:27 AM.