Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0292
@ Actionjeff et al
Interesting stuff. There has been a disproportionately large amount of misinformation in the bodybuilding world, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It's tough to just give up what I assumed to be true, T-nation one of many sites that endorses timing carbs, but I will probably end up deferring to you guys.
Next assumption I have ready to be debunked - Mixing fats and carbs, specifically simple carbs. I love sausage, but I'm aware it's very fatty so I try to separate it from the times I splurge on a baguette or some rice. The science they present seems sound, boosting insulin putting our bodies into storage mode, whether that be protein or fat. Is there anything wrong with this theory?
@ Scary
Oh OK. Funny, I haven't been to Paris yet! If I go it will be this next weekend but there is a distinct possibility that I do not make it to Paris after living in France for 4 months. I don't regret it, but it's pretty ridiculous when Paris=France for most people. I asked how was life, I haven't talked to you in a long time.
yeah, a ton.
It pretty much assumes that insulin is the only hormone relevant for fat storage and demonstrates a misunderstanding of digestion. This is along the same lines that absolutely you have to massively spike insulin levels with a high GI P+C shake PWO for anabolism. And it comes from the SAME guys who recommend massively megadosing BCAAS- which are highly insulinogenic. I've heard some argue, well that's OK because it's in between meals- lol. As though the food from several meals prior isn't still digesting. But those guys aren't getting fatter or showing bad results on that protocol either. Because the insulin spiking just isn't that important.
Rather than run down the issues, I think this thread covers a lot:
http://forums.lylemcdonald.com/showthread.php?t=1585
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat...a-calorie.html
I assume your reading on this was Berardi. He hasn't actually written about this theory for a long time because he figured out that it was wrong and got a LOT of flack for it.
I've heard that he now describes it as being a function of having enough carbs pre workout and a postworkout shake- which combined with breakfast are probably the most crucial times to have carbs. Which is fine, but also isn't what he originally said.
I've also heard that despite this, he will immediately start spewing P+C and F+P partitioning crap to new clients looking for nutrition consultation, which IMO is intellectually dishonest to say the least.