Quote:
Originally Posted by theblackkeys
wat thu **** does this even mean?
Can you elaborate on this?
And this?
Or should I just go read charliefrancis and elite track and come back later?
btw, I don't understand the argument in choosing the DL over the squat. It makes no sense/is incorrect. Squat works more muscle over a longer ROM. And the program looked pretty ****ty.
About things never being equal:
It's a simplistic view of sprint training that all you have to do is getting weight room numbers up at low body weigths - which is basically what he promotes. There are plenty of 11.0 second sprinters that throw around way bigger DL, squat and PC numbers at lower body weight than Usain Bolt. Bigger strength often improves performance but there are about a million other factors you have to consider to get the full picture. One of these things is technique, which you can only get from specific work, but Ross doesnt see this as important. When called out on these things he has a tendency to stop responding. There is no "holy grail", but it does sound good when you try to sell a product.
About the angle of attack and 10m runs:
There are olympic weightlifters that can follow very fast sprinters over the first 10 meters. Basically for the same reasons that they often have a huge vertical jump: Their explosive strength is huge, and that is 90% of what you need in a fast start.
The technique(s) used by sprinters in the initial acceleration phase might in fact not be the fastest way of covering 10 meters. But other methods would put the body in a position where it wouldn't be able to apply the force efficiently in the following sections of the race.
I'm definitely not the best at explaining these things (or understanding them for that matter), and the lengthy discussions on both Charliefrancis and EliteTrack are great. On Elitetrack there's a good thread where Ross tries to defend his views, is horrible at it, and disappears when things get too tough.
As for choosing the DL over the squat:
"The squat does not require anywhere near the number of muscles involved in the Dl so it's not as efficient an exercise." - Barry Ross
I agree with you, it's laughably incorrect and makes no sense.