Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobber
About things never being equal:
It's a simplistic view of sprint training that all you have to do is getting weight room numbers up at low body weigths - which is basically what he promotes. There are plenty of 11.0 second sprinters that throw around way bigger DL, squat and PC numbers at lower body weight than Usain Bolt. Bigger strength often improves performance but there are about a million other factors you have to consider to get the full picture. One of these things is technique, which you can only get from specific work, but Ross doesnt see this as important. When called out on these things he has a tendency to stop responding. There is no "holy grail", but it does sound good when you try to sell a product.
You're making a common logical error here. Just because someone ELSE who sprints can lift more than one guy does not mean he will be faster, no one is arguing that point, well maybe he is but that's not what I got out of it. The point is that making YOURSELF stronger will make you perform better. There's no point in comparing how much two different people lift, because as you said there are a million other factors.
Quote:
About the angle of attack and 10m runs:
There are olympic weightlifters that can follow very fast sprinters over the first 10 meters. Basically for the same reasons that they often have a huge vertical jump: Their explosive strength is huge, and that is 90% of what you need in a fast start.
The technique(s) used by sprinters in the initial acceleration phase might in fact not be the fastest way of covering 10 meters. But other methods would put the body in a position where it wouldn't be able to apply the force efficiently in the following sections of the race.
So are you saying if you're strong enough to have an above average start (in comparison to elite sprinters, heh), that you will end up in a worse position later in the race? Or are strong starters just people who focus too much on one part of the race and that's the reason you're seeing ****ty performances from them later in the race?
Quote:
I agree with you, it's laughably incorrect and makes no sense.
The only argument I'd make for it in choosing it over the squat is that is a lot simpler to learn, but if you're going to be spending a significant amount of time in the weight room you need to be putting forth the effort to learn the more complicated movement anyways.
What do you think about his comments about not resorting to gimmicky stuff?
Last edited by theblackkeys; 03-17-2010 at 06:26 PM.