is nano rakeback worth it? - RakeReduction.com Rakeback

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Sponsored Support Forums RakeReduction.com Rakeback

is nano rakeback worth it?

...

04-10-2010 , 01:17 PM

nonsimplesimon

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 10,166

Hello -

I'm on pokerstars and I'm thinking of moving over to a rakeback supported poker room to take advantage of the rakeback offers they have ... but I'm a nano stakes LHE player ... like 5c/10c and 10c/20c playing maybe up to four tables at a time ... MAX.

I probably play about 3-5k hands a week.

I'm not sure if it's really worth it to me to move from PS where I'm building a sizeable database but I don't earn rakeback there ... not yet anyway.

So is it really worth it. If it's nano stakes ... is it nano rakeback? THanks.

04-10-2010 , 04:22 PM

Gregvenezia

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,319

is there a reason you posted this in all the rakeback sections here?

04-10-2010 , 05:08 PM

Heineken77

banned

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 202

in before lock

04-30-2010 , 07:12 PM

funkyj

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 6,416

if the FTP rake rate is 6.66%, then FTP + rakeback vs PokerStars is a wash.

If you play FTP stakes where the rake is 5% then FTP is better.

Back in the old days when 10NL and below at FTP was raked 10% then FTP, even with rakeback, was much worse than 10NL and below as PS.

...