Looks like all regs at the table

Bovada / Ignition, Hold'em No Limit - $0.25/$0.50 - 6 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker

Seat 2 (UTG): $52.17 (104 bb)
Seat 3 (MP): $51.70 (103 bb)
Seat 4 (CO): $48.50 (97 bb)
Seat 5 (BU): $54.71 (109 bb)
Seat 6 (SB): $49.50 (99 bb)
Hero (BB): $49.25 (99 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.75) Hero (Hero) is BB with 9♣ A♣
4 players fold, Seat 6 (SB) raises to $1.50, Hero (BB) calls $1

Flop: ($3) 4♦ 4♥ 3♥ (2 players)
Seat 6 (SB) bets $1.43, Hero (BB) calls $1.43

Turn: ($5.86) 7♦ (2 players)
Seat 6 (SB) bets $1.79, Hero (BB) calls $1.79

River: ($9.44) 3♣ (2 players)
Seat 6 (SB) bets $2.49, Hero (BB) raises to $16.44

You rep here not even 3, but 77 exactly, and you turn decent bluffcatcher into bluff

Should we be getting to the river with this combo? Seems close.

My wild guess is that villain had 67 or a7 and called R raise

I pretty much don't think my Ace high is good almost ever OTR. No one bluffs this sizing.

is folding turn ok here?
is river raise irrelevant of our holding/we are just selling the story as BB we have more 3 and 4x in our range?
not sure how credible river raise is. it looks strong as hell though for what little we are representing

Yeah I think we can comfortably fold turn here

]


dont make generalizations like this

I like the play.

Small bets represent maybe Ak or such.

We likely splitting the pot, or winning, like the raise.

You're supposed to make generalization's all the time. They are called pop tendencies

He folded 88 in game.

Still not sure I like it but it worked.

Wow, don't know if I would have done that, though I was bluffed off 88 with QQ on flop when villain shoves with Kc3c (50nl Zone).

As stated, I like the play. I was putting him on Ax with those small bets. He should have gone bigger, imho.

Being result marchant is fine, but why we assume small bet is not quads or boat, hero in hand is capped, villain is just valuebetting wide with small sizing given he have better pp's, hand is just spew, but villlain had like 100 hands or less sample and just fold (as peole will be overfolding vs unks), in long term Doodoo get obliterated by regs with such plays, i repeat 1 more time, he reps bluff and he have bluff, i doubt he ever only calls flop with a 4, he may have 77 that actully may slowpaly now, but why? villain went for thin value without plan what to do if he gets raised, but with enaugh HUD data, they notice flop fold 10%,.turn fold 20%, its not rocket science to make calldown WHEN YOU HAVE sample on maniac

Tendencies/leanings =/= generalizations

Because everyone has bet sizing tells at the micros.

confirmed obliterated by regs

Not sure about those bet sizing tells against regs, but i definitely have sizing tells pre and post against fish (even if regs are involed in pot), i like to bet small on river with nuts against maniac, it work 9/10 times. From my POV on PS nl25 biggest losers outside weekends are fish lags, unlike true manaics who have element of supprise, LAG fish regs are easy to read after 200 hands, just dont be this guy, i have highest winrate when i play boring solid poker, just valuebetting better than villains, folding 3rd nuts when it's right better than villain, not stacking jj or ak pre when it's right, this is how you win in poker, but yeah, maybe you need to add ocassional spew to get paid a bit more