Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
pokersites pokersites

08-08-2015 , 05:01 PM
Im not shure if this is the right place to ask, but im a regular on Pokerstars (5NL) and wanted to know if there are any major diferences between the micros at Pokerstars and other sites like 888 or FTP. (Stakes, difficulty, rakeback, anything..)
thanks
pokersites Quote
08-09-2015 , 10:17 AM
Yes there is, if you dont mind playing HUDLESS and dont make making lighter calldowns I'd suggest UNIBET is brilliant for micro players!

Stars is great for tournaments and rakeback grinding at the higher limits but as a microstakes site it sucks.

Spread your wings, try a few different sites and see what you think.
pokersites Quote
08-09-2015 , 04:54 PM
thanks man, really apreciate the advice
pokersites Quote
08-09-2015 , 05:34 PM
imo there's no value to switch to a softer site when you're playing micro stakes. I view beating 25nl and less as "practice" and sort of an investment. Because you really need to have the fundamentals nailed to do so. You can switch to a softer site and win more right now, but if you're a 5nl player you're not even close to being a good player (not meant to be an insult ). So in the short term I think you should just focus on improving as much as you can instead of worrying about slightly increasing your WR at 5nl by switching to another site.
pokersites Quote
08-09-2015 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanJWarburton
Stars is great for tournaments and rakeback grinding at the higher limits but as a microstakes site it sucks.
Why do you think Stars sucks for microstakes?
pokersites Quote

      
m