Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Official pacific poker regulars thread Official pacific poker regulars thread

07-12-2012 , 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
lolwut?
got any proof of this?

You sure it's not simply the case that you can sit out longer when you get felted than when it's a 'voluntary' sit-out? If that were the case, it would explain why it seems like fish get longer...cuz they get felted more.
Nope, doesn't matter if they've busted or not. Its been happening for quite a while, it started not long after that bug where certain players could sit out forever at which time they were probably testing this "fish can sit out longer system".
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-12-2012 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by roy_miami
Nope, doesn't matter if they've busted or not. Its been happening for quite a while, it started not long after that bug where certain players could sit out forever at which time they were probably testing this "fish can sit out longer system".
Sorry, I still don't believe this.
888/Pacific's always been rife with F'd up little quirks. For example, sometimes their ratholing prevention mechanism stops working altogether and you can return to a table w/ a min buy-in immediately after leaving.

You're gonna need to provide some proof of the above being some sort of calculated 888 action that only affects whatever you think they define as a 'fish'.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-15-2012 , 01:47 PM
any one know the average time for a cashout to neteller from WSOP?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-15-2012 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
Sorry, I still don't believe this.
888/Pacific's always been rife with F'd up little quirks. For example, sometimes their ratholing prevention mechanism stops working altogether and you can return to a table w/ a min buy-in immediately after leaving.

You're gonna need to provide some proof of the above being some sort of calculated 888 action that only affects whatever you think they define as a 'fish'.
very interested about this also. need more details/solid evidence.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 03:04 PM
is there any way to stop getting 2/3 pop ups every time i log in?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megloooo
is there any way to stop getting 2/3 pop ups every time i log in?
I'm on LuckyAce and don't see any pop ups at login. If your pop up windows have similar titles, they can be autoclosed with AHK.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 03:33 PM
im on 888, they are always to do with bonus's

not a major problem, just annoying as i log in a few times a day
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
Sorry, I still don't believe this.
888/Pacific's always been rife with F'd up little quirks. For example, sometimes their ratholing prevention mechanism stops working altogether and you can return to a table w/ a min buy-in immediately after leaving.

You're gonna need to provide some proof of the above being some sort of calculated 888 action that only affects whatever you think they define as a 'fish'.
If you want proof you just need to be able to count...

I don't have a problem with it as long as this is the only code related benefit awarded to the fish. Actually, it would be really cool if they took it a step further and instabooted regs that sit out after the fish sits out.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by roy_miami
If you want proof you just need to be able to count...

I don't have a problem with it as long as this is the only code related benefit awarded to the fish. Actually, it would be really cool if they took it a step further and instabooted regs that sit out after the fish sits out.
and how can you be sure it doesn't have something to do with the number of time you are on the table?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 09:47 PM
so people agree that pacific is rigged?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-16-2012 , 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jex
so people agree that pacific is rigged?
yes, stay away
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-19-2012 , 01:38 AM
Back in the time 888 cancell my prop deal and leave me in the street whit 0 % ... was nice to help you start your network ..

Now did somebody somehow have rakeback ?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-19-2012 , 07:47 AM
Rb deals were shut down in April. Also heard they now require $175k rake per annum to become VIP Diamond (magnificent 36%, mind the 8 tables cap), even if you're already one (before it was something like $75k to maintain). If it goes on like this, they will soon return to flat 2% they used to have pre rewards program.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-20-2012 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by koxx
Rb deals were shut down in April. Also heard they now require $175k rake per annum to become VIP Diamond (magnificent 36%, mind the 8 tables cap), even if you're already one (before it was something like $75k to maintain). If it goes on like this, they will soon return to flat 2% they used to have pre rewards program.
they want the reg to gtfo
888 are too ******ed to realise they need regs as much as they need fishes-.-
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 03:07 AM
Hello, just dropping by to say I appreciate players who are willing to at least try to start tables like omgvincenzo or dehrwardu (somethin like that) I know Jolmer did a few times and IWillBluffU (despite always leaving after 5 minutes)

oh and I despise mother****ers like yayfor16 who sits WHILE we're trying to start tables and he ****ing sits out the entire ****ing time

cheers yayfor16 u lil ****
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 03:11 AM
I don't play a lot of volume at 888 but I'm pretty sure I have seen yayfor16 start tables before.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 06:44 AM


........
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMD
I don't play a lot of volume at 888 but I'm pretty sure I have seen yayfor16 start tables before.
he doesn't, to me sitting on an empty table waiting ONLY for a brain dead moron to sit in does not qualify as starting tables
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMD


........
Is Dewani1314 really a fish? Tables usually fill with regs quickly when he's playing but in my stats, despite semi-fishy stats, he appears to be a winner
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:00 PM
he is phil ivey. run quick when you see him at the table.
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:10 PM
Koxx, pls edit ur post.
Recreational players have google, too.

Last edited by Pummi81; 07-23-2012 at 04:11 PM. Reason: Dewa*****
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:14 PM
too late, can't edit it anymore
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by koxx
Is Dewani1314 really a fish? Tables usually fill with regs quickly when he's playing but in my stats, despite semi-fishy stats, he appears to be a winner
can you really not tell from how they play alone if they're winners or not -_-;
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
can you really not tell from how they play alone if they're winners or not -_-;
Such judgments can be deceiving. That orgi guy from Germany played in a similar way to dewani last year and was a MASSIVE winner over a good sample. I regret every hand I played vs him. Was he a fish to you, too?
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote
07-23-2012 , 04:56 PM
dunno I barely played last year, name rings a bell but I don't really remember him, I know dewani isn't a complete ****tard but he's still a very weak "regular"
Official pacific poker regulars thread Quote

      
m