me too. i wouldnt mind playing cts/gp on 5/10 though, but id sure like to know it was them i was playing.

in other news, im on 70k downer from max..in what, 3k hands? pretty terrible month so far

If they're playing a regular; then yes, they should announce it.

i like how CR could have just as easily never released this video and EC10 would be unknowingly owned for $1500

I still think its not mainly about those 1.5k, but the probably -EV for the near/midst future which may very easily cost him a LOT more...

I agree with EC.

they're representatives of the site and they play publicly. it's obviously a special distinction when you play on your own name, (eventually) have a custom avatar and are paid money by the site in several ways to log time playing.

Epic picture lifted from NVG. Awesome in so many ways.

lololol iceman teddy lolololol

surprised no one from CR has posted anything in this thread yet

wow what a great pic!

LOL

i've seen him around the rio the past few days.

"playing 100-200... or higher!"

not to self, when mediocre tag/tagfish/fish 3bet river, check raise river, or most of the time bluff raise river THEY ALWAYS HAVE IT. god, omg this guy reps absolutly nothing i call with top pair, oh gosh he has a rivered set again, how can this be???? THATS COS THEY ALWAYS HAVE IT. <--- thats my new note on my screen lol.


also that peachykeen vid, he flats AA against CO in the BTN. Flop comes QQ9 with 2 spades, and he raises the guys cbet 100bb deep. and then he says... wait for it... HE WOULD FOLD IF HE SHOVES???? ok at this moment my jaw dropped. and i wondered if i had been doing things horribly wrong, or if this guy is just super nitty and adjusts that way. because i see pple raise me here with tons of crap and a Q is a pretty small part of their range. thoughts about this?

You guys think playing someone HU for like 100 hands is going to be purely skill based and because cts + gp are so great they are going to beat EC for tons of money?

What if EC destroyed cts+gp and won $10k from them? I haven't watched the entire video yet but I'm getting the impression that EC lost money. Would he really be mad if he had been up?

I'm just playing devil's advocate here. Don't know who I agree with.

yeah; if EC is the first guy in the vid, then they barely played.

Hmmm yeah I've thought for a while that it was a bit unfair for some players to have their games dissected publicly, but then doesn't that go on quite a bit on these forums?

Like every time someone posts a hand vs a specific player


I think blanking out names is a pretty good idea

I assumed EC was McShove They probably play like 50 minutes against eachother (again I've only watched 30 minutes) so that can't be a ton of hands. But if he was the guy who called the 4bet w/ KT they played like 30-50 hands it seemed.

EC10 is not McShove.

oh ok

Yeah, he's Monster Kill.

So in short: he outed himself over 30 hands of play?

No, his name was posted all over the grudge match thread against Daliman.

soo, i am getting into vegas in a few hours? how many of u are down there already? i want free drinks from all you donks that got money back from UB. Thanks

If you guys haven't seen it, you seriously need to watch the cardplayer tv high stakes living episode on the ICEMAN.

You will seriously lol the whole video he is such a tool.

i appreciate all the support everyone. its noon now and i still haven't received an email or PM from them. i'm not really sure what more i can/will do other than the CR forum post i made and the post here.


like i addressed in an earlier post, i am lucky that i played poorly and only played a short session. the two big hands they critiqued were a no brainer critique for any semi competent 2/4+ player. so yes, i would definitely still have a right to be angry at the situation if i won 10k from them playing well and running well and that was the video CR saw instead of the one they did.

PokerStars Game #17955009503: Hold'em No Limit ($5/$10) - 2008/06/06 - 12:33:47 (ET)
Table 'Ausonia IV' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Fiude ($1636 in chips)
Seat 2: martybicardi ($215 in chips)
Seat 3: Poly_Baller ($990 in chips)
Seat 4: LittleZen ($200 in chips)
Seat 5: Gkastone ($4391.95 in chips)
Seat 6: matt0278 ($461 in chips)
Poly_Baller: posts small blind $5
LittleZen: posts big blind $10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Poly_Baller [Td 8d]
Gkastone: raises $30 to $40
matt0278: folds
Fiude: folds
martybicardi: folds
Poly_Baller: calls $35
LittleZen: folds
*** FLOP *** [Tc Ks 7h]
Poly_Baller: checks
Gkastone: bets $65
Poly_Baller: calls $65
*** TURN *** [Tc Ks 7h] [Kc]
Poly_Baller: checks
Gkastone: checks
*** RIVER *** [Tc Ks 7h Kc] [7c]
Poly_Baller: bets $885 and is all-in
Gkastone said, "aa"
Gkastone: folds
Uncalled bet ($885) returned to Poly_Baller
Poly_Baller collected $217 from pot
Poly_Baller: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $220 | Rake $3
Board [Tc Ks 7h Kc 7c]
Seat 1: Fiude folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: martybicardi (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Poly_Baller (small blind) collected ($217)
Seat 4: LittleZen (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Gkastone folded on the River
Seat 6: matt0278 folded before Flop (didn't bet)


is this considered a value mis-type?