Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****OCTOBER LC THREAD**** NSFW (LDO) ****OCTOBER LC THREAD**** NSFW (LDO)

10-10-2009 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by filthyvermin
**** i hate mtts. 2.5 hours down the drain.


t250/t500 Blinds + t50 - 9 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

UTG: t14388 M = 11.99
UTG+1: t37837 M = 31.53
UTG+2: t25322 M = 21.10
MP1: t17940 M = 14.95
MP2: t21710 M = 18.09
CO: t13046 M = 10.87
BTN: t4056 M = 3.38
Hero (SB): t19614 M = 16.34
BB: t3673 M = 3.06

Pre Flop: (t1200) Hero is SB with 8 8
4 folds, MP2 calls t500, 2 folds, Hero raises to t19564 all in, 1 fold, MP2 calls t19064

Flop: (t40078) A 5 A

Turn: (t40078) 3

River: (t40078) 6

Final Pot: t40078
MP2 shows T T (two pair, Aces and Tens)
Hero shows 8 8 (two pair, Aces and Eights)
MP2 wins t40078
this is pretty unnecessary, you play HUSNG's. Play the hand OOP.
10-10-2009 , 11:09 PM



















10-10-2009 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejumpoff
I played beer pong against a team of dudes wearing the exact same outfit. *shudder*

It was WSOBP 2007 tho, and it was hosted in vegas, so yeah, anything went. Wasn't even the craziest stuff going on during the tourney.

Nice series, as always.
10-10-2009 , 11:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radeh
^^^ Chiry doesn't like heavy women, he deleted the pic you posted last time I dared to post it
I think somebody reported the post last time.

If anybody wants to report that kind of stuff, I'm fine with deleting it.
10-11-2009 , 12:04 AM
Great post jumpoff!
10-11-2009 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejumpoff
[IMG]
ummm wtf is that belly button ring thing? looks so shopped and awful either way.

girl is fine though obv
10-11-2009 , 01:09 AM
thejumpoff FTW
10-11-2009 , 01:44 AM
sick post tjo
10-11-2009 , 01:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
Honestly, that's what pisses me off about the pro gun people. If you think owning a rifle will protect you from the government, then you're an idiot.

With the way military technology is these days, the right to "arm" yourselves with guns won't mean ****.

Worst interpretation of the constitution ever.

That's a perfect example of "made sense 200+ years ago, but does not apply today." Kind of like the wire act applying to online gambling, to be honest.

I'm not saying gun rights activists don't have a point with "the right to carry doesn't make things more dangerous" it's just that what the founding fathers meant has absolutely nothing to do with what goes on today.
When the bill of rights was drafted, I think "arms" basically meant rifles and pistols, which were the pinnacle of weaponry at the time. I think if the same men were asked point blank "exactly what types of weapons should citizens be able to own?," the answer would be "any type of weapon that is available."

There are obviously problems with that, in this day when we have bombs that can level cities. But the idea behind the 2nd amendment was to provide the people with a means of defense from tyrannical government, meaning they should be able to own those weapons which could make them competitive in a battle, given they could even the numbers.

Anyway, what we're allowed now would be like allowing spears in their time, and in my mind is clearly not what the forefathers intended. I don't know what their solution would be today, with fighter jets and nuclear subs and laser satellites and whatever, but they would want measures in place to protect the people from a situation where President Obama wants to be King Obama. He could probably do it, if the military didn't all defect.


Anyway, I'm not sure what your point was. I guess you're in favor of more gun control, but that goes against what the forefathers intended, in my interpretation at least.
10-11-2009 , 09:52 AM
Had this party last night

there wuz this girl there didn't speak much to her but we had this sort of eye contact and she gave a "im gonna suck your dick" sort of look if u know what I mean.. We had like 1 min of small talk, then we were getting taxis to the club. In the end I didn't go and she did..

she sent me this txt last night

Sorry tgsm, really don't usually do this....but do you fancy doing something this wk? Wd appreciate if you didn't relay this/read into this too much as im quite possibly shooting myself in the foot here? Sophie x


best reply?
10-11-2009 , 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGSM89
best reply?
No reply imo, or something like "probably better if we don't hang out right now". She made it clear that she wants to be with the other dude, play hard to get if you fancy her

Otherwise you'll fall into the "friend trap".

Why do I feel like Dr. Phil...this is a poker forum, I shouldn't feel that way!!!
10-11-2009 , 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGSM89
Had this party last night

there wuz this girl there didn't speak much to her but we had this sort of eye contact and she gave a "im gonna suck your dick" sort of look if u know what I mean.. We had like 1 min of small talk, then we were getting taxis to the club. In the end I didn't go and she did..

she sent me this txt last night

Sorry tgsm, really don't usually do this....but do you fancy doing something this wk? Wd appreciate if you didn't relay this/read into this too much as im quite possibly shooting myself in the foot here? Sophie x


best reply?
Have her send you pics of what she'll be wearing, obv.
10-11-2009 , 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radeh
No reply imo, or something like "probably better if we don't hang out right now". She made it clear that she wants to be with the other dude, play hard to get if you fancy her

Otherwise you'll fall into the "friend trap".

Why do I feel like Dr. Phil...this is a poker forum, I shouldn't feel that way!!!
nah. this is dif girl. no boyfriend
10-11-2009 , 11:55 AM
How anyone who plays poker can believe in God, or at least a non-sadistic God, is beyond me...

If there's a God, he's an ugly dude, sitting on a cloud, watching us players through a giant magnifying glass...and randomly delivering badbeats for his own sick entertainment.

Last edited by Radeh; 10-11-2009 at 12:00 PM.
10-11-2009 , 12:12 PM
this tune

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSxy6QcdkjA


so fit
10-11-2009 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sejje
When the bill of rights was drafted, I think "arms" basically meant rifles and pistols, which were the pinnacle of weaponry at the time. I think if the same men were asked point blank "exactly what types of weapons should citizens be able to own?," the answer would be "any type of weapon that is available."

There are obviously problems with that, in this day when we have bombs that can level cities. But the idea behind the 2nd amendment was to provide the people with a means of defense from tyrannical government, meaning they should be able to own those weapons which could make them competitive in a battle, given they could even the numbers.

Anyway, what we're allowed now would be like allowing spears in their time, and in my mind is clearly not what the forefathers intended. I don't know what their solution would be today, with fighter jets and nuclear subs and laser satellites and whatever, but they would want measures in place to protect the people from a situation where President Obama wants to be King Obama. He could probably do it, if the military didn't all defect.


Anyway, I'm not sure what your point was. I guess you're in favor of more gun control, but that goes against what the forefathers intended, in my interpretation at least.
the right of people to legally bear personal arms to form a militia if necessary to protect themselves from an enemy, foreign or domestic, is the most rudimentary understanding of the constitution and refuting it is a sign of ignorance and personal prejudice against weapons. There is a reason the first amendment is freedom of speech and the 2nd is the means by which to defend those freedoms.

My con law > > your con law

EDIT: this was in response to chicagory's first post but it didn't quote it in your post although we agree

PS: Barack Obama's title should officially be changed to Our Dear Leader Barack Obama and we should erect a 1000 foot gold statue of him
10-11-2009 , 12:59 PM
I vote we change the 2nd amendment to legalize drugs. I think it would do more than any form of gun control to reduce violence in America.

It's a win win right?
10-11-2009 , 01:01 PM
Also isn't it clear that the Nobel committee just wanted to reward us for picking a person that has a decent command of the English language? Thats the main reason I voted for him.
10-11-2009 , 01:08 PM
Pr1nnyraiding has opened my eyes. Why didnt' I go through that series earlier?

I could always beat LAGs, Loose passives and weak tights, but a decent TAG was always an issue for me, where I'd probably just quit. No more! I'm a tilt-inducing monster!
10-11-2009 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by another_rack
I vote we change the 2nd amendment to legalize drugs. I think it would do more than any form of gun control to reduce violence in America.

It's a win win right?
I'm 100% convinced the 2nd WW could have been prevented if they could have just turned Hitler into a dopehead.
10-11-2009 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by another_rack
I vote we change the 2nd amendment to legalize drugs. I think it would do more than any form of gun control to reduce violence in America.

It's a win win right?
Or we just attack the poppy fields in Afghanistan, processing plants in Columbia (would probably force us to make a deal with Chavez for his blessing since he seems to support the FARC) and legalize pot.

That combined effort should help the Mexican government get rid of the powerful border gangs, disrupt the supply of hard drugs for quite some time and give our government a chance to put out some real programs to take kids off the streets and get them some legitimate jobs/schooling.

The poppy fields in Afghanistan have killed more people than the terrorists could ever dream of, yet our armies aren't really making that a priority (the contrary a few years ago when I read about it last, they were purposely letting people farm that stuff so that they wouldn't have to worry about what to do with them if they eradicated their fields).
10-11-2009 , 02:23 PM
UB has 23k players online right now. Stars has 243k . I def def need to make a Stars account.
10-11-2009 , 02:26 PM
I really enjoy ChicagoRy's article about playing 25-50 level HUSNG and read some interesting stuff there. I find some articles at the sticker but I couldn't find the rest articles, and I have tried the search engine!!! can someone plz help me to find the rest of articles about playing 25-50 blind level HUSNG article?? thx
10-11-2009 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
The poppy fields in Afghanistan have killed more people than the terrorists could ever dream of
on the list of things that kill people terrorism is ranked about 887,688,485th. more people die from slipping in the shower than from terrorism, no joke.

      
m