Fareed could do 10bb/100 at 50 zoom IMO over 100k hands. He's about the only micro/small stakes guy that could.

Come on Fareed step up to the plate and take the bet!

How much you offering phil and what's the line?

I think even for Fareed it's a 3.5 to 1 shot.

I think u defo need minimum 100k sample to give regs a chance to adjust to any mid-high stakes player coming into the pool, taking on the bet and blitzing the nits

At that sample I doubt many if any could do 10bb/100 at 50z.

I mean if I could do 7bb in 20k hands then isunk can easily do 10bb+ for 25k or 50k sample but I don't think he would make it for 100k hands and I would bet on that but like thrill only a micro stakes amount

Should get a medal or something for feeding the fishes!
Every damn friday the same...

welcome to the club h3l6e,
the most money i lose fridays/saturdays, thats the reason i wont play tonight, lol

fareed is awesome, agree!
i mean to give a spot would be fair cause im sure its impossible. BUT: i was offering the bet cause i saw a post like 10bb/100 should be normal. so if anybody says he would make it, then it means that he is sure about it and doesnt need a spot, right? i would also give it a try if i would get 4/1 over 50k sample.

its funny cause in a german forum they r discussing the same like '10bb/100 at 50 should be possible for a GOOD player', but noone can post a grpah, lol

i just think that many players are totally underrating nl50/100fr and i heard this soooo many times now, also a friend of mine (nl400-1kfr reg) told me once when i started playing online at nl50zoom in october last year: 'if you dont beat this with 10bb/100 then you dont have to continue...' ok, last month he played nl100 zoom and dropped 20 bi's or so over 50k hands...

Ppl will always say sick wrs are possible and then never achieve or be able to back them up

ILUVTHRILL I'll bet against you at 4/1

This.
At least YF managed to prove that 10nl is rigged.

I hope i never play $10nl again.

Its a horrible level ... and rigged obviously.

Exactly, 4bb/100 over 100 and smthing k hands = rigged

are you playing fr or 6max? i had a ton of trouble playing 6max, switched back to fr and things went a lot smoother (same with nl5 even, sucking at 6max, crushing FR)

I never win money when running good, just lose less. 10nl ftw.

I play full ring.

I was just joking about the rigged bit though ... mainly because i had a better win rate than YF ... which should be right as im the better player ..

Just think $10nl FR is a horrible place to be ... especially on Stars ... so many lost souls on Stars stuck at $10nl playing a lot of hands and getting little in return .

I know their pain.

I have a special relationship with nl10 too haha, notice the 20 BIs below EV



edit: probably a bit offtopic to post an outdated graph, october going well so far (inb4 inevitable downswing)

That's my biography

If we could remove $10nl and AK from full ring then my life would be complete.

The whole site is rigged, every 80/20 feels like a 48/52 flip.

Run like **** at NL25, move down where I don't respect their raises:



Gonna try ipoker for a while.

A bit late with my goals, but here they are

[ ] Get unstuck
[ ] Don't go broke
[~16,500 so far] 85,000 hands
[$30 so far] $100 in bonuses

NL10 Rogged

DC coach Blah234 tried out 100NL zoom for a video over 100k hands and came out 10bb/100 winner. It was 6M though but still....if you're a crusher at mid-stakes, you can crush the lower stakes for 10bb.
But still very soul crushing to have people telling you if you can't beat 50NL for 10bb/100 then you suck

Lol 100k hands, like that actually means anything

[x] Living on my past `glories`



[x] All hands from last year
[x] Not bad for a gimp like me

Everything is reletive when it comes to WR`s, how good you are, what levels you are playing, how long it takes you to adjust to a new level, how well you run.

Im not sure people are realizing how well someone has to run over 100K hands to be able to achieve 10bb/100. I think at the normal tables I could probably do that again but I suck at Zoom and have no chance of even getting near those results. My results this year prove that, either that or I have run really badly.

Please can someone explain to me why I thought playing Zoom/Rush would be a good idea? Its taken me 9 months of telling myself you will do well at Zoom to work out that its not going to happen.

Almost anyone can easily do 10bb/100 at 50nl normal tables by only playing really good tables. I could be a 10bb winner at 600nl by table selecting even though I am probably -10bb on the average table.

Zoom is completely different because you always have to play the average table, even when the game is soft you get a few extra bb but it will probably not get you to 10bb/100.

No Money @ 50nl/ Can't beat 50nl.
Fish on heater [x]