Villain is 15/10 with 3 3b over 1k hands. I've only seen him 4bet twice, both times with KK. Given these informations I should snap-fold here right? I just followed the old never fold KK pre, ever.


PokerStars - €0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 100 BB (VPIP: 16.33, PFR: 9.62, 3Bet Preflop: 5.95, Hands: 460)
SB: 101.8 BB (VPIP: 16.39, PFR: 13.35, 3Bet Preflop: 4.58, Hands: 1,684)
Hero (BB): 103.2 BB
UTG: 113.6 BB (VPIP: 19.12, PFR: 14.71, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 72)
MP: 96.4 BB (VPIP: 13.82, PFR: 9.99, 3Bet Preflop: 2.95, Hands: 944)
CO: 160.8 BB (VPIP: 20.26, PFR: 18.28, 3Bet Preflop: 6.12, Hands: 472)

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has K K

fold, MP raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 11 BB, MP raises to 33 BB, Hero raises to 103.2 BB and is all-in, MP calls 63.4 BB and is all-in

Flop: (193.2 BB, 2 players) 7 8 2

Turn: (193.2 BB, 2 players) 9

River: (193.2 BB, 2 players) 4

Post a hand where you actually had a decision to make instead

fold river...

Edit: can probably fold turn

To give you a real answer, if they only 3bet a 3% range over 1k hands I think it's safe to assume they're not ever 3 betting light and what they 3bet they want to get all in pre. Taking that one step further, since that's the case, their 4bet range is probably the same. If these are hands they want to get all in and they're THAT nitty at 6 max (vpip/pfr) they're probably ignoring any other context and trying to get that 3% range AI pre no matter what. KK kills a 3% range. Depending on what they like that's 99+ and AKs or maybe JJ+ and AK suited or not. You're way ahead either way especially considering you're getting better than 1:1 when they call your shove given how it played out, and there's also whatever minimal (perhaps non existent though) fold equity you get being the aggressor here.

He should have check/raised the river