If he's 3bet calling range is 99 +, AQ + I have 70% equity, what do you guys think? Even against sets I have good equity. I thought about shoving the flop, maybe a call from an overpair.

PokerStars - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BTN): 160.4 BB
SB: 95.6 BB (VPIP: 12.50, PFR: 8.33, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 24)
BB: 133.8 BB (VPIP: 17.91, PFR: 14.93, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 70)
UTG: 153.4 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
MP: 193.6 BB (VPIP: 40.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 5)
CO: 30.6 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has A A

UTG raises to 3.4 BB, fold, fold, Hero raises to 15.6 BB, fold, fold, UTG calls 12.2 BB

Flop: (32.6 BB, 2 players) 9 5 T
UTG checks, Hero bets 24 BB, UTG raises to 48 BB, Hero calls 24 BB

Turn: (128.6 BB, 2 players) Q
UTG bets 89.8 BB and is all-in, Hero ?

I would go all in on flop, but in this case I think I'm folding turn

This flop hits his range much better than yours. He has 6sets and 3 2p, several draws and few combo draw, you have overpair or Ahigh. If V is able to see it you will face many c/r and with Aclub rather check flop.

Shamway99, I don't think he's 3bet calling range is that wide on top of that he calls OOP and 4x 3bet.

what do you think he has in range to open from UTG that hits T95 except for pp? you assume he opens with 95?

Maybe. Definitely calling T9s is better than AQo.

At NL5 they call 3bet with premium hands I haven't seen a call with conncetors, or suited stuff that are not of the sort AKs. If he's not a super fish.

Crazy.. just now there is a thread where UTG called 3bet with 95s. The same expert?

I emphasize on the words "he's not super fish" of course some people will call but that are like the 1% of NL5 players. You read the hand as if you played against 99% not as 1%. Btw that's the first hand from my other post someone showed something worse than pp or premium hand in a 3betted pot and I've played quite a lot of hands.

I dont want to argue about his range. You know the players better. Only saying that calling AQo is fishy whereas calling 99 T9s QJs 150bb deep is completely OK.
You got the second best hand of your range(after AKcc) and are not happy calling. So much about value betting flop.

Yes, I don't want to argue either you are more experienced I agree with you that calling 99, T9s, QJs is better. Yet I don't see it on NL5.

Btw what did he have? Interesting hand posted and hard decision ott. Gto call, do not know whether we can make explo fold.

AhQd

We are deeper i just see, still he can have QQ,JJ here and perhaps he is minsraise/folding it but also KcQc a good draw.
Pot to stack ratio is like 5 and i always broke AA on T9 here, still we block Nutflush and have BD if he has TT.
I would just shove because he cant call with TT for 12 bb to setmine here and i dont want to become superweak.
And he is unknown he can have AT here to and minraises on flop are not allways superstrong in 3-bet pot, he also could just call with KK here to.
There are 12 Combos of TT,99 that beat us, thats all and many monsterdraws are possible like QcJc or KcJc and so one.
I just broke here, point.
We protected so high pre, we sholdnt fold and calling only causes problems oop, if he has a draw and hits and folds if he dont but calls to the shove.